NEWS

7 Nov 2025 - The need for unconventional oil

6 Nov 2025 - The boom in Australian securitised credit

5 Nov 2025 - Beyond the 'Not so magnificent 17'

4 Nov 2025 - Magellan Global Quarterly Update
|
Magellan Global Quarterly Update Magellan Asset Management October 2025 (Viewing time: 17 mins) |
|
Head of Global Equities Arvid Streimann and Portfolio Manager Casey McLean provide an update on the Magellan Global Fund, reflecting on a quarter dominated by strong equity market performance and heightened investor focus on AI and semiconductor companies. |
|
Funds operated by this manager: Magellan Global Fund (Open Class Units) ASX:MGOC , Magellan Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund No.2 , Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged) , Magellan Global Fund (Hedged) , Magellan Core Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund Active ETF (ASX:OPPT) Important Information: This material has been delivered to you by Magellan Asset Management Limited ABN 31 120 593 946 AFS Licence No. 304 301 trading as Magellan Investment Partners ('Magellan Investment Partners') and has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation. This material does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. This material does not constitute an offer or inducement to engage in an investment activity nor does it form part of any offer documentation, offer or invitation to purchase, sell or subscribe for interests in any type of investment product or service. You should obtain and consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement ('PDS') and Target Market Determination ('TMD') and consider obtaining professional investment advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making a decision about whether to acquire, or continue to hold, the relevant financial product. A copy of the relevant PDS and TMD relating to a Magellan Investment Partners financial product may be obtained by calling +61 2 9235 4888 or by visiting www.magellaninvestmentpartners.com Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results and no person guarantees the future performance of any financial product or service, the amount or timing of any return from it, that asset allocations will be met, that it will be able to implement its investment strategy or that its investment objectives will be achieved. This material may contain 'forward-looking statements'. Actual events or results or the actual performance of a Magellan Investment Partners financial product or service may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. This material may include data, research and other information from third party sources. No guarantee is made that such information is accurate, complete or timely and no warranty is given regarding results obtained from its use. This information is subject to change at any time and no person has any responsibility to update any of the information provided in this material. Statements contained in this material that are not historical facts are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, opinions and beliefs of Magellan Investment Partners or the third party responsible for making those statements (as relevant). Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. No representation or warranty is made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained in this material. Magellan Investment Partners will not be responsible or liable for any losses arising from your use or reliance upon any part of the information contained in this material. Any third-party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners and Magellan Investment Partners claims no ownership in, nor any affiliation with, such trademarks. Any third-party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners, are used for information purposes and only to identify the company names or brands of their respective owners, and no affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement should be inferred from such use. This material and the information contained within it may not be reproduced, or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Magellan Investment Partners. (080825-#W17) |

3 Nov 2025 - Manager Insights | East Coast Capital Management
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, speaks with Simone Haslinger, Chief Executive Officer at East Coast Capital Management. Simone shares how clear, sustained trends across commodities, precious metals, and tech equities powered a standout quarter for East Coast Capital, emphasizing the strength of their fully systematic, data-driven strategy that thrives on market momentum and delivers steady, uncorrelated returns.
|

31 Oct 2025 - Expert analysis on what the RBA will do next Tuesday, November 4
|
Expert analysis on what the RBA will do next Tuesday, November 4 FundMonitors.com 31 October 2025 |
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, speaks with Nicholas Chaplin, Director and Portfolio Manager at Seed Funds Management, and Renny Ellis, Director & Head of Portfolio Management at Arculus Funds Management. In this insightful discussion, the trio unpack the latest Australian inflation figures for the September quarter and consider what they might mean for interest rates, economic momentum, and investor sentiment heading into 2025. With the Reserve Bank's next move under close scrutiny, the conversation explores the data behind the numbers -- and what could lie ahead for markets and monetary policy. |

31 Oct 2025 - Janus Henderson x Berkeley Insight Collective: Evaluating corporate transition plans - from theory t
|
Janus Henderson x Berkeley Insight Collective: Evaluating corporate transition plans - from theory to engagement Janus Henderson Investors October 2025 (7-minute read) Drawing on insights from Dara O'Rourke, Associate Professor at UC Berkeley, we explore why a holistic evaluation of climate transition is important - and how our proprietary Climate Transition Assessment (CTA) -- shaped by key learnings from the Berkeley curriculum -- enables investors to better evaluate corporate climate transition plans. Financial materiality of climate riskAs part of the co-developed Janus Henderson x Berkeley Insight Collective curriculum, our investment teams explored how climate change is not only a sustainability issue for investors -- it's a material financial risk. A company's climate transition plan is a strategic commitment that provides investors with essential insight into how the business intends to allocate capital, manage long-term risks, and seize opportunities in the shift to a low-carbon economy - all of which are critical to sustaining competitiveness and value creation. Companies without credible transition plans face mounting exposure to business disruptions, regulatory pressure, reputational damage, and the risk of stranded assets. Those that fail to align their strategies with climate realities may also risk losing their social license to operate -- not only in the eyes of regulators and investors, but in the markets they serve. The question is no longer whether firms should transition, but how credibly they can do so. From the outside, it's often difficult to tell which companies are truly implementing credible transition plans. We believe leaders in this transition will be those that combine bold ambition with tangible action, and strong governance with measurable progress. Dara O'Rourke, Associate Professor at UC Berkeley's Rausser College of Natural Resources:
Elevating engagements through proprietary dataTransition readiness doesn't just help us evaluate companies -- it shapes how we engage with them. Leveraging our proprietary research and data to understand how companies plan to navigate the transition not only informs our investment evaluation, but also shapes how we engage with them. We can tailor our conversations and engagement strategies to specific gaps we identify - helping ensure that capital is aligned with credible, forward-looking strategies. For example, if a company shows strong ambition and governance but weak investment, we can encourage capital expenditure alignment and clearer implementation plans. If a company's achievements are trailing despite having the right frameworks in place, our focus may shift towards enhancing transparency and setting interim milestones. This data-driven strategy allows us to transcend generic interactions and pose questions that are precise, relevant, and rooted in solid data. Assessing the building blocks of a transition plan -- what we look forTo support deeper analysis of climate-related risks and opportunities, we've developed a proprietary, data-driven Climate Transition Assessment (CTA) tool, leveraging insights from our co-developed curriculum with UC Berkeley. Available to all our investors and analysts, this tool draws on dozens of data points from third party providers and applies our proprietary scoring methodology. The CTA evaluates companies across four strategic dimensions - our '4-As' framework:
Ambition is where a company signals its intent. We assess whether that intent is credible, comprehensive, and aligned with global climate goals. This includes the scope and timelines of emissions reduction targets, reliance on offsets, and whether targets are validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Near-term targets are especially important. We also consider whether ambition is grounded in science -- using third-party metrics like implied temperature rise and peer-relative transition scores -- and whether the company's targets reflect its sectoral carbon budget. Action is where ambition becomes operational. We assess whether companies are investing in the transition through capital allocation, operational changes, and innovation. This includes climate-aligned CapEx (capital expenditure) and OpEx (operational expenditure), green revenues, supply chain engagement, deployment of low-carbon technologies and internal carbon pricing. This helps us determine whether a company is actively aligning its strategy with a low-carbon future. Accountability is arguably the most important dimension - it's what turns ambitions into execution and ensures that climate goals are treated with the same seriousness and financial ones. A company can have high ambitions and even take action toward them, but without governance structures that embed climate into decision-making, progress is fragile. We assess whether climate oversight exists at board level, whether executive compensation is linked to sustainability, and whether disclosure practices are in place. We also look for internal actionable metrics -- such as business unit-level KPIs (key performance indicators) or climate-linked performance reviews -- that translate climate goals into day-to-day operations. Governance risks like pay controversies, shareholder dissent, and leadership concerns also inform our view of credibility. Achievements is the ultimate test: is the company delivering results? We assess emissions trends, absolute emissions and carbon intensity, and performance relative to peers. While results must be interpreted in context, they are a critical indicator of credibility. A company may not be hitting every target-- emissions may even be rising -- but if ambition, action, and accountability are strong, we see a clear and credible path to decarbonisation. Temporary emission increases due to acquisitions or strategic investments -- especially in decarbonising technologies -- may be justifiable, but over time, progress must be evident and consistent with stated goals. Our CTA in actionIn a recent engagement with a transportation equipment manufacturer, our CTA revealed a disconnect between the company's stated ambition and its execution. While the company set a 1.5°C-aligned target for Scope 1 and 2 emissions, the lack of SBTi validation and limited investment in green activities raised questions about credibility. The CTA also flagged gaps in verification and capital allocation, prompting us to dig deeper. We asked targeted questions on executive incentives, scenario analysis, and internal carbon pricing -- all informed by the CTA's findings. The company confirmed that while it does not plan to seek SBTi validation, it conducts scenario analysis, applies carbon pricing in select regions, and links sustainability goals to executive bonuses. Our data-driven engagement didn't just highlight gaps -- it enabled a more focused, informed, and ultimately productive dialogue. Dara O'Rourke, Associate Professor at UC Berkeley's Rausser College of Natural Resources:
Key conclusionsClimate transition plans are no longer optional -- they are a financial imperative. Our proprietary data tools and informed client engagements provide clarity to a fragmented and inconsistent landscape, helping investors distinguish between companies that are genuinely aligned with the transition and those that are not. We believe comprehensive investment insights lead to better-functioning markets by enabling more effective comparison across companies, supporting efficient capital allocation, and reducing the risk of misinformed investment decisions. Our comprehensive research and data tools strengthen our ability to better manage financially material risks for our clients-- from stranded assets and regulatory penalties to reputational damage and long-term value erosion. By evaluating ambition, action, accountability, and achievements in an integrated framework, we can engage with precision -- asking the right question to drive targeted outcomes., In a rapidly evolving landscape, these insights help us manage climate risk, protect portfolios, and support the shift to a more sustainable economy. |
|
Funds operated by this manager: Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund , Janus Henderson Conservative Fixed Interest Fund , Janus Henderson Diversified Credit Fund , Janus Henderson Global Natural Resources Fund , Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund , Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund - Institutional , Janus Henderson Conservative Fixed Interest Fund - Institutional , Janus Henderson Cash Fund - Institutional , Janus Henderson Global Multi-Strategy Fund , Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity Fund , Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Fund Disclaimer: This article reflects the views of the author(s) at the date of publication and does not necessarily represent those of FundMonitors.com. It is provided for general information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Market data, views, and forward-looking statements were current as at 1 October 2025 and may change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should consider their own objectives and obtain professional advice before making investment decisions. All opinions and estimates in this information are subject to change without notice and are the views of the author at the time of publication. Janus Henderson is not under any obligation to update this information to the extent that it is or becomes out of date or incorrect. The information herein shall not in any way constitute advice or an invitation to invest. It is solely for information purposes and subject to change without notice. This information does not purport to be a comprehensive statement or description of any markets or securities referred to within. Any references to individual securities do not constitute a securities recommendation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Whilst Janus Henderson believe that the information is correct at the date of publication, no warranty or representation is given to this effect and no responsibility can be accepted by Janus Henderson to any end users for any action taken on the basis of this information. |

drivers of both risk and opportunity across our portfolio holdings.
30 Oct 2025 - Three critical social issues reshaping Australian investment risks in 2025

29 Oct 2025 - China's Energy Pivot: The Turning Point Investors Can't Ignore

24 Oct 2025 - European & Australian ABS: 2025 review and outlook for the remainder of the year
|
European & Australian ABS: 2025 review and outlook for the remainder of the year Challenger Investment Management October 2025 12-minute read Our expectations, laid out in the outlook for 2025, {European & Australian ABS: Rounding up 2024 and looking ahead to 2025}, included high issuance volumes across both European and Australian ABS and for asset performance of collateral to remain relatively stable - despite rates remaining higher for longer than market expectations. 2025 year to date Market review - were our expectations in line with reality? Focus themes: Tariff impacts and Macro economic uncertainty After a strong start to the year in Q1, markets faced uncertainty in Q2 given President Trump's tariff announcement. Although new issue markets did grind to a halt and spreads widened to levels comparable to early 2024, volatility in securitised credit was lower than corporate credit given lower credit spread duration and higher average ratings. This was further dampened in European and Australian securitised credit by the low exposure to rate volatility as assets are predominantly floating rate. See our review of this period here: {Lessons from Liberation Day: Is now the right time to consider diversifying into securitised credit?} As markets rebounded, European ABS primary markets saw a strong pick up in May with issuers keen to get deals priced before the annual Global ABS conference in Barcelona, early June. Despite increased supply, spreads retraced from April wides with the secondary market subdued by investor focus on new issue markets. Strong Technical demand and supply from less traditional sectors A continued lack of mezzanine issuance and strong demand from investors persisted during the first half of the year. As a result, post the April tariff-induced volatility, spreads have reached YTD tights across asset classes globally. This has encouraged not only repeat issuers to come to market but also some new sectors/collateral included in transactions. Examples are RMBS transactions including HELOC (Home Equity Line of Credit) mortgage collateral in the UK and issuers transitioning previously private platforms to public markets. The second half of July and August gave us the traditionally quiet pipeline in Europe. In Europe, it is worth noting deals were still being placed privately or preplaced in part due to the more atypical collateral financed such as equity release products and legacy mortgage pool securitisations. On the regulatory front, June saw the release of the new EU securitisation framework proposals where key themes include changes to capital and reporting requirements, the motivation of which is to lower barriers for both issuers and investors. It is noted that the implementation is on a long-time horizon, likely through to 2027, given continued consultation and lengthy legislative process. Further detail is provided towards the end of this note. Expectations to Year End 2025 The last few months of 2025 are expected to be shaped by a complex and evolving geopolitical and macroeconomic landscape. Political and geopolitical risks are front-of-mind for market participants and we expect this dynamic will persist into year-end and beyond. Investor sentiment remains highly sensitive to developments in global trade policy as well as the pace of Federal reserve rate cuts. Political developments in the U.S. and the potential escalation of the conflict in Ukraine add further layers of complexity to the investment environment. Notwithstanding this backdrop, technicals for the ABS market globally remain strong. Supply of new issue paper has held up well, with volumes similar to those seen in 2024, and spreads tightening as demand has held up. However, macroeconomic fundamentals do remain a concern for specific jurisdictions. We remain vigilant for any changes in performance of the underlying consumers, and we look to rating agencies to maintain appropriate performance assumptions to limit rating risk for our investors. Issuance Despite the markets facing uncertainty during Q2 and the inevitable stall in primary issuance across Europe and Australia, issuance volumes as at end September 2025 are at just over €71bn in European ABS, slightly lower than the issuance year to date in 2024. We expect issuers to capitalise on windows of market stability, leading to concentrated bursts of primary activity--September being a prime example with €14.6bn of transactions priced, the highest month of issuance since May 2024. Absent any macro shocks, we expect European ABS 2025 issuance to beat the annual record for post GFC issuance volume set in 2024. In Australia, YTD issuance volumes have been high at AUD50.9bn as at end September largely on par with last year's breakout year for issuance which had reached AUD$59.4bn for the equivalent period. September was also a post GFC record month for issuance. With a strong pipeline for October, we expect issuance volumes to remain at a strong cadence during October and November with issuers aiming to have deals priced before the annual Australian Securitisation Conference, late November. Asset Performance Performance of underlying collateral In European ABS has remained stable across most sectors aided by the decline in rates observed to date and continued resilience of employment statistics. In Australia, asset performance varied by receivable type and lender, but the lower interest rate environment is broadly viewed as supportive for borrowers. Generally, collateral performance has held up relatively well despite pressures on household servicing costs, helped by floating-rate structures and gradual policy easing. Spread Dynamics and Demand Given the continued supply demand dynamic for mezzanine issuance, we continue to see high subscription levels in primary and competitive BWIC auction processes in secondary for mezzanine investment grade bonds. For larger, more established platforms, denominated in EUR, we continue to see the placement of senior paper can be affected by bouts of large supply with newer issuers often less covered and at wider spreads. Australian ABS spreads have compressed significantly across the capital structure, with the single A and BBB rated tranches pricing similarly to European transactions during September. The credit curve is relatively flat compared to European issuance with the more senior parts of the capital structure still offering a significant basis to their European counterparts. Also, the breadth of issuers and emergence of new collateral types, structures and issuers across Europe and Australia continues to present opportunities for investors to earn a premium over more traditional platforms. We note that structured finance spreads across sectors and jurisdictions are testing on to post GFC tights but continue to hold that the benefits on holding securitised products which include; a pickup to similarly rated corporates, limited spread duration, and exposure to floating rate assets. We discuss structure finance as an alternative to corporate credit. Regulatory Activity continues to evolve Market participants were kept busy as always, with non-market related regulatory activity - in particular, the EU regulatory reform and UK autos ruling (see below) UK Auto Court Rulings: We covered the uncertainty that Court rulings provided UK auto lenders and ABS investors in our article here, "Uncertainty Weighs on UK Auto Lenders Due to Recent Court Rulings", at the start of the year. What did the Supreme Court decide? The Supreme Court overturned the Court of Appeal's decision and ruled that UK dealers did not owe a fiduciary or disinterested duty to the borrowers. This removed the spectre of widespread, large claims for compensation based solely on hidden commission arrangements. There is still some work being done by the FCA on a potential redress scheme focusing on Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs), which were banned in 2021. Impact on UK Auto ABS? As we noted in our piece above, the impact on UK Auto Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) did remain limited, thanks to strong structural protections and credit enhancements, although secondary liquidity was more challenged until more clarity was reached. Publicly distributed issuance in UK Auto ABS across bank and non-bank lenders, was €3.6bn in 2024 compared to no issuance at all seen until September this year, in the space. Will UK Auto ABS issuance pick up? We do expect a pickup in issuance, as demonstrated by the first UK Auto ABS to price since the since the Supreme Court ruling. In mid-September, VW UK placed Driver 10 publicly with the senior class A spread at 60bp and 100bp above SONIA, on the Class B and with an increased deal size to just over €700mn due to demand. This compared very well to the previous Driver transaction price in September 2024, where the senior tranche also priced at 60bp over SONIA. The transaction placement is a positive signal for UK non-bank lenders and will have given them confidence in execution. That said we do note that given lower origination volumes, the funding needs of these lenders may be more muted in the near term. European Securitisation Regulation: A consultation was launched in Q4 2024 by the European Commission to gather feedback from the industry on a wide range of issues pertaining to the EU securitisation market. The legislative proposals were presented in June 2025 and overall, the reaction from market participants was positive regards proposed changes to the STS framework. We limit our discussion here on the proposed changes to high level comments as the final proposals come out next year but the aim on the proposals is stated as to reduce barriers to issuance and investment in EU securitisation. The expected changes include those we believe are most relevant, below:
Challenger IM Credit Income Fund , Challenger IM Multi-Sector Private Lending Fund For Adviser & Investors Only Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication has been prepared solely for solely for the addressee. The information has been prepared on the basis that the Client is a wholesale client within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), is general in nature and is not intended to constitute advice or a securities recommendation. It should be regarded as general information only rather than advice. Because of that, the Client should, before acting on any such information, consider its appropriateness, having regard to the Client's objectives, financial situation and needs. Any information provided or conclusions made in this report, whether express or implied, do not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of the Client. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Neither Fidante Partners Limited ABN 94 002 895 592 AFSL 234 668 (Fidante Partners) nor any other person guarantees the repayment of capital or any particular rate of return of the Client portfolio. Except to the extent prohibited by statute, Fidante Partners or any director, officer, employee or agent of Fidante Partners, do not accept any liability (whether in negligence or otherwise) for any errors or omissions contained in this report. |

