No events currently listed.
Find a Fund
Peer Group Analysis View All»
| Index Selector Links | 1 Year | 3 Year | 5 Year |
|---|---|---|---|
14.20% |
9.56% |
9.43% |
|
5.17% |
5.77% |
3.01% |
|
-31.80% |
15.03% |
8.30% |
|
26.94% |
15.83% |
7.06% |
|
14.67% |
9.54% |
7.95% |
|
18.27% |
13.87% |
10.45% |
|
10.10% |
11.47% |
5.19% |
|
9.31% |
9.37% |
8.69% |
|
7.82% |
15.40% |
9.45% |
|
13.11% |
11.38% |
6.86% |
|
18.29% |
17.11% |
9.11% |
|
22.01% |
13.59% |
12.74% |
|
10.53% |
9.15% |
6.72% |
|
6.69% |
8.49% |
7.00% |
|
3.20% |
0.16% |
3.25% |
|
8.27% |
8.72% |
7.89% |
Hedge Clippings

13 Mar 2026 - Hedge Clippings |13 March 2026
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 13 March 2026
"It never rains, but it pours" is an old phrase that comes to mind when considering markets and global politics at present. AI, which had been driving sections of the market (and the market as a whole) since it was launched in the form of ChatGPT in November 2022, has seemingly turned from being a positive, and now reflects many of the risks (disruption, employment, capex, energy). Market darlings, such as Aussie home grown Atlassian, are indicative as they announced layoffs of 1600 staff this week, and have seen their share price fall from a peak of US$483 in October 2021, to below $75 as of now. Meanwhile, to the end user, AI's benefits are being implemented into everyday business operations at an amazing pace. Closer to home, February's reporting season was one of the most volatile on record. Two thirds (66%) of funds' performance numbers have been received to date, with wild fluctuations thanks to an ASX reporting season which provided plenty of surprises - both to the upside and on the downside. Overall, the ASX 200 Total Return (TR) index rose 4.11%, while the ASX Small Ordinaries (TR) fell by 2.57%. In this environment, many active equity managers struggled, while others, (although only 10% outperformed the ASX 200 TR) produced some impressive numbers. For the month, returns ranged from -21% (digital) through to +13.29% (not surprisingly, a global gold fund, Argonaut) reflecting their respective underlying asset or market sector. Over 12 months that became even more pronounced, with returns ranging from -53% (digital again) through to +233% (gold and key minerals again). While these outliers were obviously driven by headwinds or tailwinds respectively, between the extremes, a combination of strategy, sector, peer group, and most importantly, old fashioned manager skill, determined the outcome. Of interest was the appearance in February's top performers of Japanese Equity funds (average 12.10%), and Infrastructure Funds (average February return of 7.73%), while Managed Futures (Winton +5.05% and ECCM +4.59%) also stood out, alongside the inevitable gold, precious metals, and resources funds. Meanwhile the world suffers financial upheaval. If the rotation out of tech in the US, along with February's reporting season, weren't enough to throw markets into a turmoil, the US and Israeli attack on Iran completed the perfect storm. Somehow ("I'll end all wars") Trump seemed to think US arms and firepower would quickly bring the Iranian regime, and its 90 million + inhabitants to their knees begging forgiveness. He is obviously not a student of history when it comes to US overseas military endeavours, including Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, all of which (for the US at least) ended badly. This one is yet to play out, but whatever Trump claims, "quick" and "victory" seem a while away. Closer to home. We had the pleasure of interviewing George Bory from Allspring this week, a US$485 billion manager of Global Income funds and strategies being distributed in Australia by the team at Bennelong Funds Management. We managed to cover not only Allspring's and George's approach to bond investing - "Manage risk, rather than avoid it" - through to the current situation in the Middle East and its potential economic outcome, and finally the outlook for the US given the mid term elections which may or may not clip Trump's wings somewhat. You can see the full video here, or view the individual sections. Next week there's an RBA board meeting on Monday and Tuesday. As if things weren't complex and difficult enough already! We'll be joined as usual by our resident experts Nick Chaplin from Seed Funds Management and Renny Ellis from Arculus, to preview what they think the RBA is likely to do, and what they should do - which of course might be completely different. News | Insights Manager Insights | Allspring Global Investments Ben McVicar discusses the data centre effect | Magellan Investment Partners February 2026 Performance News Bennelong Concentrated Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |

20 Mar 2026 - Performance Report: Cyan C3G Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

20 Mar 2026 - Performance Report: Bennelong Long Short Equity Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

20 Mar 2026 - Investment considerations of prolonged uncertainty over Iran
|
Investment considerations of prolonged uncertainty over Iran Janus Henderson Investors March 2026 (8-minute read) The conflict in the Middle East has escalated over the last few days and hopes for a short war have faded. Regional diplomatic efforts to de-escalate appear to be failing and Iran continues to retaliate in response to strikes from the US and Israel. As a result, the Strait of Hormuz - the world's most important gateway for energy commodities - remains effectively closed to all but the most buccaneering of shipping companies. The Strait closure is a result of a lack of insurance, firms not willing to risk the loss of future capacity if ships are sunk, and concerns for the welfare of sailors after several fatalities already. However, there are now risks of more intensive intervention from the US and/or Israel following reports that they are considering putting boots on the ground, either to try and extract Iranian enriched nuclear material or to take Kharg Island, a key sea terminal for Iranian oil exports. At the same time, a new Supreme Leader of Iran has been chosen who is seen as another hardliner. This is unlikely to be taken well by the US, who would have preferred someone more moderate, and the choice appears unlikely to create a path to de-escalation. The desired end point is still uncertainIt is still not immediately clear what the ultimate objectives for the US and Israel are. Various intentions have been publicly stated but it is not clear which of these are red lines and which are just preferences. A further reduction of the potential for Iran to build nuclear weapons appears to be the closest to a requisite. However, given that strikes in 2025 were deemed to have achieved this, defining the outcome is difficult. Similarly, a desire to destroy Iran's long-range missile program has been expressed, but this may similarly be difficult to guarantee. Finally, regime change, either for military or humanitarian reasons, is now touted as a key objective, but it remains unclear how this can be achieved with airstrikes alone. The objective mattersUnderstanding the motivating objectives is important when considering how long the war might last and the subsequent economic impact. We can look to several factors that suggest this could be a more prolonged campaign. Iran has indicated that it can continue with its current rate of response for six months, far longer than the weeks-long engagement that markets appeared to have been pricing. The US has expressed that it wishes to remove the previously enriched uranium that could be used in nuclear weapons, but it has been a long time since the last international inspection and its whereabouts are likely to be very uncertain. Similarly, the continuity of a new hardline leader suggests that Iran is feeling little pressure to change tack yet. However, there are also ways in which the conflict could be wound up sooner. The most obvious is that US President Trump has shown a willingness to abruptly change direction on policy multiple times throughout his leadership, no matter the scale of the impact. With mid-term elections coming up later in the year, the US government is likely to be highly sensitive to anything that pushes up the cost of living. Therefore, finding a way to declare victory and return oil prices to lower levels may ultimately dominate any longer-term military objectives. The length mattersA longer-term conflict raises the danger of greater destabilisation in the region, creates greater potential for more severe damage to key infrastructure and risks longer-lasting impact on energy supplies. While there are some ways to mitigate the impact in the near term, such as sending oil through pipelines to ports less likely to be targeted, or by releasing strategic reserves outside of the Middle East, these are either inherently temporary or lack the potential capacity to offset prolonged restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz. Oil is often seen as the key commodity when considering conflicts in the Middle East, given its relevance to US gasoline prices in particular, but natural gas supplies are crucial for other regions, such as Europe, and other base products feed into areas from chemicals to fertilisers. Last week, markets appeared to be pricing energy commodities in line with a short-term interruption to the ease of supply. Assumptions around this appear to have changed over the weekend, with prices now moving to incorporate greater risk of a prolonged engagement. The lack of clarity around the US/Israeli objectives does nothing to reduce the uncertainty that markets hate. Impact on marketsThe price of oil has spiked above US$100 per barrel as concerns about supplies have intensified. European natural gas prices have almost doubled since the end of February. This is raising the spectre of the inflationary impulse generated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 and the subsequent removal of much of the Russian supply into energy markets. Concerns about a jump in European inflation or simply prolonged stickiness in the US are lifting bond yields. US Treasury yields have moved higher as markets have taken out one of the US Federal Reserve interest rate cuts that were anticipated by the end of the year. Yields on 10-year Treasuries have seen less movement than their European counterparts, as US jobs numbers on Friday served to offset some upward yield pressure from expected inflation. Concerns about inflation have seen surges in German and UK breakeven rates, with market pricing for the European Central Bank interest rates at the end of 2026 now looking at over 1.5 hikes. Since the end of February, expectations for the Bank of England have shifted from two cuts by the end of 2026 to a better than 50:50 chance that there will be an interest rate hike - a marked shift in the outlook. Markets are now pricing in higher oil prices for the foreseeable future, with concerns mounting about a stagflationary outcome, should higher energy costs stall a re-acceleration in economic growth. The uncertainty has provided support for the much-maligned US dollar, given the American economy is looking better set to weather an energy shock than elsewhere. However, higher bond yields and a stronger greenback have dampened gold's ability to rally in the current environment, following strong performance during other recent periods of volatility. Equity markets are seeing something of a reversal of recent performance dynamics. Markets that started the year positively, to the end of February, suddenly look under greater pressure. A stronger dollar and higher oil prices are weighing on Asian stocks that had been surging in the first two months of the year. Gas prices remain Europe's geopolitical Achilles heel and markets are clearly concerned that the region is overly exposed again. In the US, last week saw some signs of a reversal of the recent outperformance of Value stocks over their Growth counterparts. AI-related stocks have struggled in 2026 so far compared to the rest of the market, but the fears that higher oil prices could dent the very rosy economic outlook are leading to something of a reconsideration. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz is unprecedented, undoubtedly making for severe impacts on risk assets. However, to put the sell-off in proper context, investors must also recognise that equities entered the conflict trading at a meaningful premium over historical valuation levels. The forward price/earnings ratios (P/Es) of major global equity markets were at top quartile levels versus their 20-year histories[1], roughly a 15%-30% premium compared to median levels. Indeed, the markets experiencing the largest sell-offs are the ones that entered the conflict with the highest returns year to date[2]. Risks of a prolonged war but don't rule out a quick "victory"Situations like this demonstrate the value of well-diversified multi-asset portfolios. Geopolitical events are rarely easy to gain complete clarity on, with the current US administration apparently embracing uncertainty as a negotiation strategy. What we can take away from the events of the last few days is that it is likely the conflict could last longer than many had initially hoped. This means there is the potential for greater economic impact - and markets have moved to price in this change. There is the potential for faster inflation and slower economic growth, with assets focusing on different aspects thus far. However, risks remain two-sided. US political pressures means that a quick "victory" should not be ruled out. Asset prices, driven by energy prices, are likely to swing violently as investors alter their expectations for either outcome. [1] Source: Datastream, 27 February 2026. Past performance does not predict future returns. [2] Source: Bloomberg, 31 December 2025 to 9 March 2026. Past performance does not predict future returns. |
|
Funds operated by this manager: Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund , Janus Henderson Conservative Fixed Interest Fund , Janus Henderson Diversified Credit Fund , Janus Henderson Global Natural Resources Fund , Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund , Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund - Institutional , Janus Henderson Conservative Fixed Interest Fund - Institutional , Janus Henderson Cash Fund - Institutional , Janus Henderson Global Multi-Strategy Fund , Janus Henderson Global Sustainable Equity Fund , Janus Henderson Sustainable Credit Fund All opinions and estimates in this information are subject to change without notice and are the views of the author at the time of publication. Janus Henderson is not under any obligation to update this information to the extent that it is or becomes out of date or incorrect. The information herein shall not in any way constitute advice or an invitation to invest. It is solely for information purposes and subject to change without notice. This information does not purport to be a comprehensive statement or description of any markets or securities referred to within. Any references to individual securities do not constitute a securities recommendation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Whilst Janus Henderson believe that the information is correct at the date of publication, no warranty or representation is given to this effect and no responsibility can be accepted by Janus Henderson to any end users for any action taken on the basis of this information. |

19 Mar 2026 - Expert Analysis of the RBA's March 17 Rate Decision
|
Expert Analysis of the RBA's March 17 Rate Decision FundMonitors.com March 2026 |
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, spoke with Nicholas Chaplin, Director and Portfolio Manager at Seed Funds Management, and Renny Ellis, Director & Head of Portfolio Management at Arculus Funds Management, about the RBA's decision to raise interest rates by 0.25% in March. Both described the move as premature, noting the narrow 5-4 board vote reflected significant internal disagreement. They argued that last month's rate rise had yet to flow through to the economy, and that the board was relying on last year's inflation numbers prior to the release of the February figure due next week. In a nutshell, the decision to raise rates in March, rather than wait 6 weeks until the meeting scheduled for May 4th and 5th, was premature. The discussion also considered the role of rising oil prices and geopolitical developments, with both suggesting the RBA may have acted too quickly given the uncertain economic outlook. |

19 Mar 2026 - Performance Report: Insync Global Capital Aware Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

19 Mar 2026 - Correlation and How to Think About Diversifying Alternatives
|
Correlation and How to Think About Diversifying Alternatives Fidante February 2026 (7-minute read) Achieving diversification and uncorrelated returns are a common objective when constructing investment portfolios. Understanding what those terms really mean is essential to properly appreciate how alternative investments can contribute to robust long-term portfolios.
What is correlation?Correlation is a statistical measure of the relationship between the returns of two investments (rather than price levels). It ranges from -1 to +1. Investments with high correlation tend to move in the same direction at the same time, while investments with little or no correlation tend to move independently of each other. Negatively correlated investments tend to move in opposite directions. Importantly, two investments that both deliver positive long-term returns can nevertheless exhibit zero or even negative correlation. Conversely, investments that appear to move in opposite directions over time can be positively correlated. For example, daily price movements may show a very different relationship from the point to point one-year return. In figure 1, at first glance it may appear that the two investments shown in the left-hand chart below are positively correlated. After all, for the period shown, both have increased by about the same amount. Looking at the daily returns in the chart on the right, we can see that most days the two investments do indeed move up together, however, on some days they move in opposite directions. Counterintuitively, the correlation of these two strategies turns out to be zero. An important implication is that investors can derive diversification benefits from two investments that both go up over time.
It's also important to note that statistically high correlation does not imply causation. Just because two return series are highly correlated does not mean one necessarily causes the other to move. As a result, correlation can and does change over time.
Why does correlation matter?By combining uncorrelated investments, we can construct portfolios with lower risk and/or higher returns. This is the power of diversification. The lower the correlation between assets, the greater the potential benefit. This is where alternatives come in - no other asset class offers the same variety and breadth of uncorrelated investments as the universe of alternative investments.
A simple illustrationTo see why uncorrelated assets produce better portfolios, consider two investments, A and B. Both are expected to return 10% per year and each has volatility of 10%.
Figure 3 shows that when these investments are highly correlated, combining them does little to reduce portfolio risk. However, when correlation is low or even negative, portfolio volatility drops to levels far below that of either A or B individually, even though expected returns remain the same. This leads to higher risk adjusted returns - the portfolio earns the same return with less volatility. The effect becomes even more powerful in larger diversified portfolios. Consider an equally weighted portfolio of 50 completely uncorrelated investments, all with the same ex-ante expected return and ex-ante volatility and a modestly positive Sharpe Ratio2 of 0.3. The portfolio returns are shown by the green line on the left-hand chart, and the Sharpe Ratio is now 1.94, a significant improvement on any individual investment. However, even a small increases in correlation can significantly dilute these benefits. If these 50 investments now have a pair-wise correlation of 0.25 (still a relatively low correlation), the cumulative portfolio return becomes dramatically lower than when correlation was zero, as shown by the blue line in the right-hand chart. \While the above is a contrived example from a simulation, it illustrates just how powerful the combination of uncorrelated investments can be. This is where alternatives have the potential to play such an important role in investment portfolios.
In practice, it is extremely difficult to find large numbers of investments that are truly uncorrelated at all times. However, each additional uncorrelated investment introduced into a portfolio increases the potential diversification benefits for the portfolio. Alternative investments are often uncorrelated not only to traditional assets like equities and bonds, but also to each other, making a rich hunting ground for investors seeking to maximise the power of diversification. There is, however, an important caveat. Just as low or negative correlation enhances diversification, even small changes in correlation can undermine it, sometimes quickly and unexpectedly. What factors affect correlation?Correlation can increase during periods of market stress, economic shocks or major shifts in monetary policy. Events such as the COVID market sell off in early 2020 saw correlations spike as many assets moved sharply lower at the same time. Even if only temporary, this can have a devastating impact on portfolios if previously uncorrelated investments all move in the same direction at the same time. The experience of 2022 provided another stark example. Rising interest rates negatively affected both equities and bonds, causing the traditional 60/40 portfolio to suffer unusually large losses. Assets that investors expected to diversify one another instead moved together. Understanding the common drivers of returns is therefore critical when thinking about how correlation might change. When many investments rely on similar economic factors, such as low interest rates, correlation can rise sharply when those conditions change, as we saw in 2022. Some investors attempt to anticipate these shifts and rebalance portfolios accordingly. However, this can be difficult, so alternative investments that are less susceptible to correlation changes can be useful as 'anchor' diversifiers in a portfolio. The challenges of measuring correlation While uncorrelated investments can improve portfolio diversification and resilience, measuring correlation is not straightforward. There is no single measure to determine "true" correlation. Investors need to consider:
Useful techniques include examining rolling correlations, analysing how investments behave during market downturns and monitoring whether regime changes have altered the relationship between two investments. It's also worth remembering that correlation is only one part of the investment decision. Some investments may be attractive because of their risk/return profiles, even if diversification benefits are modest. Understanding the role of alternatives in diversification While investors often think about alternative investments as a single category, they can play very different roles within a portfolio. Broadly, alternatives can be grouped into three types based on their primary objective: growth alternatives, which aim to enhance overall portfolio returns; diversifying alternatives, which seek to improve risk adjusted returns by delivering low or uncorrelated performance; and defensive alternatives, which are designed to provide an explicit buffer during periods of market stress. Understanding these distinctions is critical, as the value an alternative investment brings depends not just on its standalone return, but on how it interacts with the rest of the portfolio. Correlation and diversification are particularly central to the second category of diversifying alternatives. Investments with low correlation can materially improve portfolio outcomes by reducing volatility without sacrificing expected returns. Diversifying alternatives can therefore allow investors to achieve better risk adjusted returns rather than simply higher absolute returns, improving the efficiency and resilience of the portfolio as a whole. In this sense, alternatives that consistently deliver diversification benefits can be among the most valuable long term building blocks in a well constructed investment portfolio. Final thoughts Correlation measures how investment returns move relative to one another, but it is not fixed and cannot be relied upon to remain stable. Because correlation is based on historical data, there is no guarantee that it won't change in the future. That said, portfolios constructed with investments with low correlation can deliver higher returns for a given level of risk than those with more highly correlated investments. Correlation can therefore be an essential part of assessing any potential investment and is of particular importance when considering alternative investments. A solid understanding of correlation, its applications and limitations allows investors to unlock the power of diversification. While correlations can change, alternative investments that deliver consistently low correlation to traditional assets can be particularly valuable in building more robust, resilient portfolios. 1Markowitz, H.M. (March 1952). "Portfolio Selection". The Journal of Finance. |

18 Mar 2026 - Performance Report: Seed Funds Management Financial Income Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

17 Mar 2026 - Performance Report: Glenmore Australian Equities Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

17 Mar 2026 - 10k Words | March 2026
|
10k Words Equitable Investors March 2026 (2-minute read) Geopolitical risk spikes. After a long period of significant divergence, long term bond yields and forecast earnings yields have reunited. Worth considering alongside the relative performance of "Growth" v "Value". Long-term inflation expectations seem to have stabilised at higher levels than was the case pre-COVID - possibly baking in higher volatility in inflation. Military action swung equity investors straying to emerging markets back to the US. That US market may be concentrated but its a lot less concentrated than the ASX - and in the current period of turbulence concentration has performed very differently relative to equal-weight portfolios in the two countries. There does seem to be more interest in active investing currently. Finally, we can't escape without a chart on the decline of listed SaaS valuations - but in the context of a convergence with unlisted AI valuations. Geopolitical Risk Index relative performance to VIX (US volatility) over 1 year Source: Caldara and Iacoviello, Koyfin US 10-year bond yield v S&P 500 forward earnings yield Source: Yardeni Growth relative to Value (iShares Russell 1000 Growth / iShares Russell 1000 Value) Source: Koyfin US 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate - relatively stable for past three years Source: Koyfin Australian 10-year Breakeven Inflation Rate Source: Equitable Investors, RBA CPI (Australia) - standard deviation of quarter-on-quarter change (rolling 30 quarters) Source: Equitable Investors, ABS Global yield spreads matrix Source: Koyfin S&P 500 relative to FTSE Emerging Index - reversal post Iran attack Source: Bloomberg Equities concentration - top 10 holdings' dominance of Aus and US major benchmarks (using iShares ETF proxies) Source: Equitable Investors, Koyfin S&P/ASX 200 - Free-float weighted (AS51) v equal-weighted indices (XEW) Source: Equitable Investors, Iress, Koyfin S&P 500 ETFs - Free-float weighted (IVW) v equal-weighted (RSP) Source: Equitable Investors, Koyfin The number of active ETFs launched each year in the US Source: Morningstar Public SaaS valuations have converged with AI-led software Source: Arcadia Capital via Archtis Funds operated by this manager: Equitable Investors Dragonfly Fund Disclaimer Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Fund returns are quoted net of all fees, expenses and accrued performance fees. Delivery of this report to a recipient should not be relied on as a representation that there has been no change since the preparation date in the affairs or financial condition of the Fund or the Trustee; or that the information contained in this report remains accurate or complete at any time after the preparation date. Equitable Investors Pty Ltd (EI) does not guarantee or make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this report. To the extent permitted by law, EI disclaims all liability that may otherwise arise due to any information in this report being inaccurate or information being omitted. This report does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation and needs of potential investors. Before making a decision to invest in the Fund the recipient should obtain professional advice. This report does not purport to contain all the information that the recipient may require to evaluate a possible investment in the Fund. The recipient should conduct their own independent analysis of the Fund and refer to the current Information Memorandum, which is available from EI. |

16 Mar 2026 - Performance Report: Bennelong Emerging Companies Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

19 Mar 2026 - Expert Analysis of the RBA's March 17 Rate Decision
|
Expert Analysis of the RBA's March 17 Rate Decision FundMonitors.com March 2026 |
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, spoke with Nicholas Chaplin, Director and Portfolio Manager at Seed Funds Management, and Renny Ellis, Director & Head of Portfolio Management at Arculus Funds Management, about the RBA's decision to raise interest rates by 0.25% in March. Both described the move as premature, noting the narrow 5-4 board vote reflected significant internal disagreement. They argued that last month's rate rise had yet to flow through to the economy, and that the board was relying on last year's inflation numbers prior to the release of the February figure due next week. In a nutshell, the decision to raise rates in March, rather than wait 6 weeks until the meeting scheduled for May 4th and 5th, was premature. The discussion also considered the role of rising oil prices and geopolitical developments, with both suggesting the RBA may have acted too quickly given the uncertain economic outlook. |

16 Mar 2026 - Manager Insights | Allspring Global Investments
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, speaks with George Bory, Chief Investment Strategist at Allspring Global Investments. They discussed Allspring's public-markets fixed-income approach, focusing on risk-aware portfolio management, steady income above inflation, and global diversification, before turning to how geopolitical tensions, oil prices, inflation, and US politics may shape bond markets and investment positioning. Key topics by timestamp:
|

9 Mar 2026 - Manager Insights | Cyan Investment Management & Equitable Investors
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, spoke with Dean Fergie, Director & Portfolio Manager at Cyan Investment Management and Martin Pretty, Director at Equitable Investors. They discussed the sharp market volatility during the latest reporting season, driven by elevated expectations around AI, shifting investor sentiment, and significant valuation resets across industrial stocks. The conversation also explored how changing money flows, speculation, and indexing influenced portfolio management and highlighted the importance of diversification in an increasingly volatile investment environment.
|

9 Mar 2026 - How to get the most from Fundmonitors | Webinar Recording 04 August 2025
|
How to get the most from Fundmonitors Webinar Recording FundMonitors.com 04 August 2025 |
|
To help you get a better understanding of the www.fundmonitors.com database, watch this webinar recording to help you learn to navigate the database and get the most out of its powerful fund analytics. The webinar covered the following:
If you like to see just 1 aspect of the webinar feel free to jump to the relevant timestamp: |

26 Feb 2026 - Manager Insights | East Coast Capital Management
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, speaks with Simone Haslinger, Chief Executive Officer at East Coast Capital Management. They discuss ECCM's systematic global trend-following strategy, recent strong performance driven by broad trends across commodities, currencies, and equity markets, and how disciplined risk management supports consistent results. The interview also highlights the importance of diversification and the role trend-following strategies can play in strengthening portfolios amid changing market conditions.
|

10 Feb 2026 - Magellan Global Equities Quarterly update January 2026
|
Magellan Global Equities Quarterly update January 2026 Magellan Investment Partners January 2026 (Viewing time: 14 mins) |
|
Against a backdrop of elevated market volatility, shifting monetary policy and divergent market dynamics, Portfolio Managers Alan Pullen and Casey McLean share their latest quarterly update on the Magellan Global Equities strategy. They discuss the impact of diverging interest-rate paths, the maturing AI trade and signs of a rotation in global equity markets. They also reflect on company earnings, broader market conditions and where they see opportunities. Looking ahead, Alan and Casey share their outlook and how the portfolio is positioned. |
|
Funds operated by this manager: Magellan Global Fund (Open Class Units) ASX:MGOC , Magellan Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund No.2 , Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged) , Magellan Global Fund (Hedged) , Magellan Core Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund Active ETF (ASX:OPPT) Important Information: This material has been delivered to you by Magellan Asset Management Limited ABN 31 120 593 946 AFS Licence No. 304 301 trading as Magellan Investment Partners ('Magellan Investment Partners') and has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation. This material does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. This material does not constitute an offer or inducement to engage in an investment activity nor does it form part of any offer documentation, offer or invitation to purchase, sell or subscribe for interests in any type of investment product or service. You should obtain and consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement ('PDS') and Target Market Determination ('TMD') and consider obtaining professional investment advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making a decision about whether to acquire, or continue to hold, the relevant financial product. A copy of the relevant PDS and TMD relating to a Magellan Investment Partners financial product may be obtained by calling +61 2 9235 4888 or by visiting www.magellaninvestmentpartners.com Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results and no person guarantees the future performance of any financial product or service, the amount or timing of any return from it, that asset allocations will be met, that it will be able to implement its investment strategy or that its investment objectives will be achieved. This material may contain 'forward-looking statements'. Actual events or results or the actual performance of a Magellan Investment Partners financial product or service may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. This material may include data, research and other information from third party sources. No guarantee is made that such information is accurate, complete or timely and no warranty is given regarding results obtained from its use. This information is subject to change at any time and no person has any responsibility to update any of the information provided in this material. Statements contained in this material that are not historical facts are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, opinions and beliefs of Magellan Investment Partners or the third party responsible for making those statements (as relevant). Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. No representation or warranty is made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained in this material. Magellan Investment Partners will not be responsible or liable for any losses arising from your use or reliance upon any part of the information contained in this material. Any third-party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners and Magellan Investment Partners claims no ownership in, nor any affiliation with, such trademarks. Any third-party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners, are used for information purposes and only to identify the company names or brands of their respective owners, and no affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement should be inferred from such use. This material and the information contained within it may not be reproduced, or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Magellan Investment Partners. (080825-#W17) |

5 Feb 2026 - Expert Analysis of the RBA's February 03 Rate Decision
|
Expert Analysis of the RBA's February 03 Rate Decision FundMonitors.com February 2026 |
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, speaks with Nicholas Chaplin, Director and Portfolio Manager at Seed Funds Management, and Renny Ellis, Director & Head of Portfolio Management at Arculus Funds Management. The discussion examines the Reserve Bank of Australia's latest rate hike, with both guests arguing the RBA misjudged conditions by cutting rates last year and is now reacting too heavily to short-term data. They highlight the role of policy lags, the strengthening Australian dollar, and bond market signals, warning that further tightening risks overshooting and undermining economic stability. |

27 Jan 2026 - Magellan Infrastructure Quarterly Update January 2026
|
Magellan Infrastructure Quarterly Update January 2026 Magellan Investment Partners January 2026 (Viewing time: 15 mins) |
|
Following a strong year for listed infrastructure assets, Co-Heads of Infrastructure and Portfolio Managers Ofer Karliner and Ben McVicar provide an overview of performance drivers and the outlook for the sector. They reflect on companies that performed well during the final quarter of 2025, as well as areas that lagged. They also discuss the key risks and opportunities facing the infrastructure sector in 2026 and outline how the portfolio is positioned to manage these risks while remaining exposed to long-term structural growth themes across global infrastructure. |
|
Funds operated by this manager: Magellan Global Fund (Open Class Units) ASX:MGOC , Magellan Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund No.2 , Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged) , Magellan Global Fund (Hedged) , Magellan Core Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund Active ETF (ASX:OPPT) Important Information: This material has been delivered to you by Magellan Asset Management Limited ABN 31 120 593 946 AFS Licence No. 304 301 trading as Magellan Investment Partners ('Magellan Investment Partners') and has been prepared for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice or as an investment recommendation. This material does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. This material does not constitute an offer or inducement to engage in an investment activity nor does it form part of any offer documentation, offer or invitation to purchase, sell or subscribe for interests in any type of investment product or service. You should obtain and consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement ('PDS') and Target Market Determination ('TMD') and consider obtaining professional investment advice tailored to your specific circumstances before making a decision about whether to acquire, or continue to hold, the relevant financial product. A copy of the relevant PDS and TMD relating to a Magellan Investment Partners financial product may be obtained by calling +61 2 9235 4888 or by visiting www.magellaninvestmentpartners.com Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results and no person guarantees the future performance of any financial product or service, the amount or timing of any return from it, that asset allocations will be met, that it will be able to implement its investment strategy or that its investment objectives will be achieved. This material may contain 'forward-looking statements'. Actual events or results or the actual performance of a Magellan Investment Partners financial product or service may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. This material may include data, research and other information from third party sources. No guarantee is made that such information is accurate, complete or timely and no warranty is given regarding results obtained from its use. This information is subject to change at any time and no person has any responsibility to update any of the information provided in this material. Statements contained in this material that are not historical facts are based on current expectations, estimates, projections, opinions and beliefs of Magellan Investment Partners or the third party responsible for making those statements (as relevant). Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. No representation or warranty is made with respect to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained in this material. Magellan Investment Partners will not be responsible or liable for any losses arising from your use or reliance upon any part of the information contained in this material. Any third-party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners and Magellan Investment Partners claims no ownership in, nor any affiliation with, such trademarks. Any third-party trademarks contained herein are the property of their respective owners, are used for information purposes and only to identify the company names or brands of their respective owners, and no affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement should be inferred from such use. This material and the information contained within it may not be reproduced, or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Magellan Investment Partners. (080825-#W17) |

15 Dec 2025 - Expert Analysis of the RBA's December 9 Rate Decision
|
Expert Analysis of the RBA's December 9 Rate Decision FundMonitors.com December 2025 |
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of FundMonitors.com, speaks with Nicholas Chaplin, Director and Portfolio Manager at Seed Funds Management, and Renny Ellis, Director & Head of Portfolio Management at Arculus Funds Management. In this discussion, they share their perspectives on the RBA's recent rate decisions, whether cuts came too early, and how inflation dynamics, subsidies, and employment data are shaping economic expectations. They also explore the likelihood of future rate movements and what investors should watch heading into 2026. |

24 Nov 2025 - Manager Insights | Magellan Investment Partners
|
Chris Gosselin speaks with Alan Pullen from Magellan Investment Partners about the philosophy behind the Magellan Global Opportunities Fund. Alan explains how the team focuses on high-quality global businesses, disciplined valuation, and long-term investing-especially important amid today's AI-driven market volatility.
Funds operated by this manager: Magellan Global Fund (Open Class Units) ASX:MGOC , Magellan Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund No.2 , Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged) , Magellan Global Fund (Hedged) , Magellan Core Infrastructure Fund , Magellan Global Opportunities Fund Active ETF (ASX:OPPT) |
Online Applicatons

Free, simple and secure
Olivia123 - the fast simple and secure online alternative to completing paper based application forms.





