NEWS

5 May 2021 - Inside the bond market sell-off
|
Inside the bond market sell-off Jay Sivapalan, CFA, Janus Henderson Investors March 2021 Over February the Australian bond market1 was down approximately 3.5%, suffering its biggest negative monthly return since 1983. In combination with its negative return in January, this episode essentially wipes 80% of the bond market's 2020 returns. Meanwhile, the 10 Year Australian Government bond yield has almost tripled since the lows experienced in 2020. While oonly the rates market has been affected so far, in our view this could extend into risk assets (such as equities, high yield and investment grade credit) if central banks don't intervene in a coordinated fashion to avoid a 'taper tantrum' style sell-off. The ingredients for a bond market sell-off have been brewing for some time, and while hard to predict the turning point, as active managers we must be poised to re-position our portfolios and identify investment opportunities. The three forces responsible 1. Rising Inflation expectations:
Chart 1: Australian 10-year breakeven inflation rate (%) Source: Bloomberg, ABS, Australian 10-year breakeven inflation rate to 4 March 2021. 2. Rising cash rate expectations:
Chart 2: Australian implied OIS forward 1m cash rate (%) Source: Janus Henderson Investors, Bloomberg, monthly to February 2021, spot 26 February 2021.
Chart 3: Yield to maturity and modified duration on the Bloomberg AusBond 0+ Yr Index Source: Janus Henderson Investors, as at 31 December 2020. Index: Bloomberg Ausbond Composite 0+ Yr Index. Note: Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. 3. Question marks over central bank commitment:
How we are navigating the turmoil Effectively navigating the more volatile rising rate environment at the key turning points will be vital given the magnitude of interest rate risk (duration). Ultimately, as yields rise, we believe it is worth taking some duration risk to capture higher yields, especially if markets overshoot. Higher bond yields when cash rates are anchored at close to zero present very steep yield curves and the opportunity for investors to participate in both the yield and roll-down effect that adds to performance. Today a 10-year risk free government bond, if nothing happens in markets over the next year, can deliver a return that's at least twice that of a five-year major bank floating rate corporate bond2. These are exactly the type of opportunities active managers wait for even if some volatility in the near-term needs to be tolerated. One will only know after the fact whether the strategy went too early or too late. The team have also been focusing on capital preservation strategies to protect against a breakout in inflation expectations. Below is an overview of our investment strategy: Rates: Duration:
Inflation protection:
Spread sectors3: Having participated in the meaningful rally of spread sectors, we feel prudent to take some profit while valuations are at peak levels in the post-COVID market rally. Semi-government debt:
Credit protection:
Investment grade credit:
High yield:
We are intentionally still exposed to credit markets, but the above provides some room for risk taking should markets become unstable. This year is shaping up to be one where active interest rate strategies, including taking advantage of higher yields, may overshadow excess returns from spread sectors. Accordingly, our strategies will emphasise this from time to time as prevailing market conditions offer investment opportunities. While we expect some volatility and drawdown, near-term volatility presents an opportunity for active managers. Ultimately, higher bond yields restore the defensive characteristics and create better value for the asset class. 1. Australian Bond Market as measured by the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index. 2. Based on no change to the current bond yield of 1.91% for 10-year Australian Government bonds and the estimated yield of an Australian five-year major bank floating rate notes of 0.45% (as at 26 February 2020). 3. The above are the Portfolio Managers' views and should not be construed as advice. Sector holdings are subject to change without notice. This information is issued by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited (AFSL 444266, ABN 16 165 119 531). The information herein shall not in any way constitute advice or an invitation to invest. It is solely for information purposes and subject to change without notice. This information does not purport to be a comprehensive statement or description of any markets or securities referred to within. Any references to individual securities do not constitute a securities recommendation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Whilst Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited believe that the information is correct at the date of this document, no warranty or representation is given to this effect and no responsibility can be accepted by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited to any end users for any action taken on the basis of this information. All opinions and estimates in this information are subject to change without notice and are the views of the author at the time of publication. Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Institutional Funds Management Limited is not under any obligation to update this information to the extent that it is or becomes out of date or incorrect. Funds operated by this manager: Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund, Janus Henderson Conservative Fixed Interest Fund, Janus Henderson Diversified Credit Fund, Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund, Janus Henderson Global Natural Resources Fund, Janus Henderson Tactical Income Fund, Janus Henderson Australian Fixed Interest Fund - Institutional, Janus Henderson Conservative Fixed Interest Fund - Institutional, Janus Henderson Cash Fund - Institutional, Janus Henderson Global Multi-Strategy Fund |

4 May 2021 - Performance Report: Insync Global Quality Equity Fund
| Report Date | |
| Manager | |
| Fund Name | |
| Strategy | |
| Latest Return Date | |
| Latest Return | |
| Latest 6 Months | |
| Latest 12 Months | |
| Latest 24 Months (pa) | |
| Annualised Since Inception | |
| Inception Date | |
| FUM (millions) | |
| Fund Overview | Insync employs four simple screens to narrow the universe of over 40,000 listed companies globally to a focus group of high-quality companies that it believes have the potential to consistently grow their profits and dividends. These screens are: size of the company, balance sheet performance, valuation and dividend quality. Companies that pass this due diligence process are then valued using dividend discount models, free cash flow yield and proprietary implied growth and expected return models. The end result is a high conviction portfolio typically of 15-30 stocks. The principal investments will be in shares of companies listed on international stock exchanges (including the US, Europe and Asia). The Fund may also hold cash, derivatives (for example futures, options and swaps), currency contracts, American Depository Receipts and Global Depository Receipts. The Fund may also invest in various types of international pooled investment vehicles. |
| Manager Comments | The portfolio's top 10 holdings at month-end included PayPal, Walt Disney, Nintendo, S&P Global, Domino's Pizza, Dollar General, Facebook, Visa, Qualcomm and Microsoft. Relative to the MSCI, the portfolio was significantly overweight IT and underweight Industrials. The 'Contactless Economy' and 'Workplace Automation' megatrends had the greatest weighting in the portfolio. Insync noted continued strong performance of cyclical stocks propelled the MSCI benchmark further ahead of the funds overall in March. They continue to see no compelling reason to alter course as this typical and short-lived phenomenon is consistent with past economic periods when coming out of a recession; overly optimistic price outcomes that result drive these types of stocks far higher than others. They point specifically to 2009/10 emerging from the GFC and 2016/17 when Trump was elected with heightened expectations of economic growth. |
| More Information |
3 May 2021 - Webinar| AIM Quarterly Webinar
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 12, 2021 11:00 AM AEST Webinar - Where are we Finding New Ideas?
We invite you to the next AIM investor webinar to be held via Zoom, Wednesday 12 May 2021 at 11 am. Charlie and the investment team will briefly cover performance and provide feedback on the 1Q company reporting period. Given the widespread concerns on market valuations, our investment team will discuss how and where we are finding new ideas for the Fund. Q&A will follow. If you would like to request a recording of the Webinar, please do so via info@aimfunds.com.au.
Time: 11:00 AM AEST Date: Wednesday the 12th of May, 2021 Register here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_X1UJK8f0RJO38KBNPhrE-w
We look forward to speaking with you.
ABOUT AIM AIM was founded in 2015 as an independent investment manager. The firm is structured to manage client investments. Activities not related to delivering this outcome are outsourced to asset management service providers to enable AIM to focus on conducting investment research, managing the portfolio, and engaging with investors. AIM is owned by its directors. They are not incentivised by any third party to sell or recommend any product or service beyond the capital they manage for their investors. In addition to business ownership, all directors are also invested in the AIM Global High Conviction Fund; the same goes for members of the staff. AIM view a significant ownership interest in the Fund as a key component to create alignment between themselves and their investors. AIM believe in their process and portfolio of businesses, and do not try and do better than their clients by investing in businesses they would not own on an investor's behalf. Equally, AIM would not own a business in the Fund that they would not own in their personal capacity. AIM are 100% aligned with their investors. |

3 May 2021 - Performance Report: Bennelong Twenty20 Australian Equities Fund
| Report Date | |
| Manager | |
| Fund Name | |
| Strategy | |
| Latest Return Date | |
| Latest Return | |
| Latest 6 Months | |
| Latest 12 Months | |
| Latest 24 Months (pa) | |
| Annualised Since Inception | |
| Inception Date | |
| FUM (millions) | |
| Fund Overview | The Fund is managed as one portfolio but comprises and combines two separately managed exposures: 1. An investment in the top 20 stocks of the markets, which the Fund achieves by taking an indexed position in the S&P/ASX 20 Index; and 2. An investment in the stocks beyond the S&P/ASX 20 Index. This exposure is managed on an active basis using a fundamental core approach. The Fund may also invest in securities expected to be listed on the ASX, securities listed or expected to be listed on other exchanges where such securities relate to ASX-listed securities.Derivative instruments may be used to replicate underlying positions and hedge market and company specific risks. The companies within the portfolio are primarily selected from, but not limited to, the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index. The Fund typically holds between 40-55 stocks and thus is considered to be highly concentrated. This means that investors should expect to see high short-term volatility. The Fund seeks to achieve growth over the long-term, therefore the minimum suggested investment timeframe is 5 years. |
| Manager Comments | The Fund has achieved up-capture and down-capture ratios (since inception) of 124% and 96% respectively, demonstrating its ability to outperform in both rising and falling markets. As at the end of March, the portfolio's weightings had been increased in the Discretionary, Communication, REIT's and Financials sectors, and decreased in the IT, Industrials and Health Care sectors. Relative to the ASX300, the Fund is significantly overweight the Discretionary sector (Fund weight: 33.6%, benchmark weight: 8.0%. The Fund's sector exposures will deviate from the benchmark only to the extent that the actively managed investment in ex-20 stocks results in an over or under-weighting position to any particular sector. |
| More Information |

3 May 2021 - Beware the beauty contest
|
Beware the beauty contest Charlie Aitken, Aitken Investment Management 20th April 2021 When reflecting on the past year, one notable takeaway for the AIM investment team is to be mindful of keeping our focus on business fundamentals rather than attempting to profit from whatever narrative is driving the market. This sounds simple enough on paper, but resisting the temptation of falling into this 'narrative fallacy' is quite difficult to achieve in practice - to such an extent that many investors step into this mindset without even realising it. The reason is deceptively simple: by definition, the vast bulk of daily news we all consume has almost nothing to do with the fundamental drivers of long-term value. Instead, daily news flow shapes the short-term expectations that drive the dominant 'narrative' in markets. To understand why we believe it is critical for investors to differentiate between fundamentals and narrative, we turn to John Maynard Keynes. Though primarily remembered as an economist, Keynes managed the King's College endowment at Cambridge from 1921 to 1946 with great success, delivering a tenfold return over a period where UK markets were essentially flat. In The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Keynes addresses the impact of market expectations on prices: The actual, private object of the most skilled investment today is 'to beat the gun'; [...] to outwit the crowd, and to pass the bad, or depreciating, half-crown to the other fellow. This may be likened to those newspaper competitions in which the competitors have to pick out the six prettiest faces from a hundred photographs, the prize being awarded to the competitor whose choice most nearly corresponds to the average preferences of the competitors as a whole; so that each competitor has to pick not those faces which he himself finds prettiest, but those which he thinks likeliest to catch the fancy of the other competitors, all of whom are looking at the problem from the same point of view. It is not a case of choosing those which, to the best of one's judgment, are really the prettiest, nor even those which average opinion genuinely thinks the prettiest. We have reached the third degree where we devote our intelligences to anticipating what average opinion expects the average opinion to be. And there are some, I believe, who practise the fourth, fifth and higher degrees. There have been some fascinating real-world tests that explore this mindset. The Financial Times posed the following question to its readers in 2015: Guess a number from 0 to 100, with the goal of making your guess as close as possible to two-thirds of the average guess of all those participating in the contest. Suppose there are three participants who guessed 40, 60 and 80. In this case, the average guess would be 60, two-thirds of which is 40, meaning the person who guessed 40 would win. In theory, a large group of people guessing a random number between 0 and 100 will eventually average out to 50. However, a 'first-degree' thinker would likely reach that conclusion, and then guess 33 (equal to two-thirds of 50). A 'second-degree' thinker might conclude that there will be enough first-degree thinkers to move the average guess closer to 33, so the 'smart' guess would be 22 (two-thirds of 33). The 'third-degree' thinker would guess 15 (two-thirds of 22), the 'fourth-degree' would guess 10 (two-thirds of 15), and so on. (In reality, the average guess in the Financial Times puzzle was 17.3, meaning the 'correct' guess was 12). Carried to its logical conclusion, it becomes obvious that the problem inherent in such a game is that there is a circular reference: each participant's guess alters the outcome, meaning contestants end up trying to guess what the other players might be guessing, and adjust their own guess accordingly. There is no point at which one can confidently get off this train of thought in the knowledge your answer is correct. The concept has come to be known as the Keynesian Beauty Contest. Real-world examples This concept quite accurately describes a market where the participants stop paying attention to the fundamentals of an asset, but rather attempt to speculate about what other people might pay for the asset at some point in future. Under such conditions, the best 'narrative' attracts the most investor interest. Sure as night follows day, inflows follow interest, pushing up prices as new buyers enter the market. Combined with some good, old-fashioned fear of missing out on easy, quick returns (the result of a collection of behavioural biases hardwired into our psychology), this dynamic can lead to prices dramatically disconnecting from the underlying economic value of an asset as more investors crowd into it. However, the 'narrative' is essentially just the consensus opinion constructed from the collective psyche of market participants. When the consensus narrative changes for an asset that has divorced from underlying fundamentals, the outcome to investors is usually a permanent and material loss - particularly when huge amounts of borrowed money have been involved in bidding up the price. The 2007/2008 US housing market crash ("house prices can only go up!") that triggered the Global Financial Crisis is a vivid example of what can happen when crowded assets owned by leveraged speculators undergo a material change in narrative. The AIM investment process is based on determining the intrinsic value of a business. While market value tells you the price other people are willing to pay for an asset, intrinsic value shows you the investment's value based on an analysis of its fundamentals and financials. We believe that discounting future cash flows that can be distributed to the owner of an asset is the best way to determining the intrinsic value of most investments. While there are some shortcomings, it has the advantage of anchoring our estimate of value to some sort of economic reality. Digital assets Of late, there has been an explosion of interest in non-cash-generating assets where determining a reliable estimate of intrinsic value is nearly impossible. We would point to the meteoric rally in cryptocurrencies, or the sudden interest in non-fungible tokens (NFTs) - essentially, tradable digital certificates that use blockchain technology to prove ownership and origin of digital assets - as examples. (Christie's recently auctioned off an NFT of the work of digital artist Beeple for USD69.3mn; the image remains freely viewable and downloadable on the internet.) These assets may have utility and even scarcity over the long term, but recent price action seems to us to exhibit all the hallmarks of a Keynesian Beauty Contest. The behaviour has arguably spilt over to other asset classes and certain pockets of the equity market. Given that capital is essentially free, many market participants are using borrowed money to place leveraged bets on asset prices continuing to rise. We find it noteworthy that there have been several liquidity-driven 'unwinds' in markets this year; from publicly available information, massive amounts of leverage were involved every time. We cannot claim to know how any of this will end, but we do know that leverage combined with highly crowded market positioning rarely ends well when an unexpected external event causes forced selling. When allocating our investors' capital, we try to understand whether the expectations embedded in the market price of the businesses we own bear at least some semblance to reality when applying a reasonable range of estimates. We try to control for fundamental risk by sticking to businesses that have strong balance sheets and generate meaningful amounts of cash. (As the wisdom goes: revenue is vanity, profit is sanity, but cash is king.) In short, we think that by sticking to a defined and repeatable process will serve investors a lot better than trying to claim the first prize in a Keynesian Beauty Contest. Funds operated by this manager: |

30 Apr 2021 - Hedge Clippings | 30 April 2021
|
|||||
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday
|

30 Apr 2021 - Managers Insights | Vantage Asset Management
|
Chris Gosselin, CEO of Australian Fund Monitors, speaks with Michael Tobin, Founder and Managing Director at Vantage Asset Management. Established in 2004, Vantage Asset Management Pty Limited is an independent investment management company with expertise in private equity, funds management, manager selection and operational management. Vantage Private Equity Growth 4 (VPEG4) is a closed-ended Private Equity fund which started on 30 September 2019 and which is due to close on 30 September 2021. The Fund continues the investment strategy of Vantage's previous two Private Equity Funds, VPEG3 and VPEG2. The Fund invests in Private Equity funds based in Australia, along with Permitted Co-investments, to create a well diversified portfolio of Private Equity investments.
|

30 Apr 2021 - Why this COVID-Hit Sector is Still Attractively Priced
|
Why this COVID-Hit Sector is Still Attractively Priced Steve Johnson, Forager April 2021 I don't know about you, but my COVID prediction record was woeful. Home furnishings boom? Nope. Motorbike retailer has best year ever? Nope. Funeral homes have their worst year ever? Definitely didn't see that coming. Everything is easy to rationalise after the event. But the way different sectors were impacted by COVID surprised me. A lot. One of those is the enterprise software sector. These companies sell software to other companies. Think accounting, customer relationship management and project planning software. Unlike software sold to individuals or small businesses, where the user simply buys the product and starts using it, most enterprise software is heavily integrated into a company's operations and customised for each client.
Forager has owned a few of these businesses over the years, including Hansen (HSN) and GBST. There are a handful in the current portfolio too, such as RPMGlobal (RUL), Fineos (FCL) and Gentrack (GTK). Once ingrained in a customer's operations, they are almost impossible to remove, making for sticky revenues and attractive long-term investments. It wasn't any surprise, then, that they were viewed as something of a safe haven in the early months of the COVID panic. In a world where some companies weren't generating any revenue at all, recurring reliable revenues from large corporates looked relatively attractive. Yet look at the table below. On the ASX at least, many of these companies are today trading well below their pre-COVID prices.
It turns out that this prediction wasn't right either. Apparently, some of the revenue isn't as recurring or reliable as investors had come to believe. Most enterprise software companies earn significant amounts of upfront implementation revenue. That depends on winning new clients. And some of the "recurring" revenue is related to clients requesting changes or introducing new features. With employees working from home and much bigger problems to deal with, most corporates have moved IT system upgrades down their lists of priorities. The impact was widespread. The recovery at utilities and airports software provider Gentrack (GTK) took a big step backwards. Bravura's (BVS) UK wealth management clients have hit pause on new deployments. Sales of Integrated Research's (IRI) performance monitoring solutions have been slow. The problems are real, but the share price reactions look overdone. The timing of a recovery is uncertain. But the deals will return, and investor optimism will likely come back alongside them. Both Forager Funds have had their best ever years of outperformance over the past 12 months. That's been a result of capitalising on widespread over-reactions, and being willing to change our minds as the evidence came to hand. In the enterprise software sector, we're doing both. Funds operated by this manager: Forager International Shares Fund, Forager Australian Shares Fund (ASX: FOR) |

30 Apr 2021 - Fund Review: Insync Global Capital Aware Fund March 2021
INSYNC GLOBAL CAPITAL AWARE FUND
Attached is our most recently updated Fund Review on the Insync Global Capital Aware Fund.
We would like to highlight the following:
- The Global Capital Aware Fund invests in a concentrated portfolio of 15-30 stocks, targeting exceptional, large cap global companies with a strong focus on dividend growth and downside protection.
- Portfolio selection is driven by a core strategy of investing in companies with sustainable growth in dividends, high returns on capital, positive free cash flows and strong balance sheets.
- Emphasis on limiting downside risk is through extensive company research, the ability to hold cash and long protective index put options.
For further details on the Fund, please do not hesitate to contact us.

30 Apr 2021 - Performance Report: Paragon Australian Long Short Fund
| Report Date | |
| Manager | |
| Fund Name | |
| Strategy | |
| Latest Return Date | |
| Latest Return | |
| Latest 6 Months | |
| Latest 12 Months | |
| Latest 24 Months (pa) | |
| Annualised Since Inception | |
| Inception Date | |
| FUM (millions) | |
| Fund Overview | Paragon's unique investment style, comprising thematic led idea generation followed with an in depth research effort, results in a concentrated portfolio of high conviction stocks. Conviction in bottom up analysis drives the investment case and ultimate position sizing: * Both quantitative analysis - probability weighted high/low/base case valuations - and qualitative analysis - company meetings, assessing management, the business model, balance sheet strength and likely direction of returns - collectively form Paragon's overall view for each investment case. * Paragon will then allocate weighting to each investment opportunity based on a risk/reward profile, capped to defined investment parameters by market cap, which are continually monitored as part of Paragon's overall risk management framework. The objective of the Paragon Fund is to produce absolute returns in excess of 10% p.a. over a 3-5 year time horizon with a low correlation to the Australian equities market. |
| Manager Comments | The Fund's down-capture ratio (since inception) of 74.72% indicates that, on average, the Fund has outperformed during the market's negative months. The Fund returned -6.2% in March. Paragon noted that whilst the major indices continued to rise there was unprecedented turbulence below the surface. Positive contributors for the Fund were Cettire, Betmakers and Chalice, offset by declines in Ionic, Adriatic and other Resources holdings. The Fund ended the month with 32 long positions and 6 short positions. |
| More Information |





