NEWS
19 Dec 2025 - Hedge Clippings |19 December 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 19 December 2025 It's too early to give clear accolades for the best performing funds for the year, but it's obviously clear that digital assets have been the worst performing peer group year to date, with an average performance of -13% to the end of November, and little chance to recover over the next 10 days. However, it does emphasise that a single year doesn't, or shouldn't, define digital funds, which returned 68% in 2024, and 86% in 2023 - and in keeping with their volatile nature, fell 50% in 2022. Over 7 years on a cumulative basis, funds in the digital asset peer group have returned 49.17%, clearly eclipsing the various equity peer groups - small cap, large cap, alternative, local and global - which have ranged between 10 and 12% annualised over the past 7 years, which in itself is a pretty attractive return. Over the past 12 months to the end of November, the average across all Equity Peer Groups has returned over 15%. Equities have certainly run hard, although sector-related, and averages don't really tell the whole story. Within all equity-based peer groups, over the past 12 months the worst-performing fund in the Top 20 funds returned 38.5%, with the Top 4 (all unsurprisingly resources-based) all exceeding 100%. The question for 2026 will be, can the equity party continue after 3 strong years, as that appears to be the recent cycle - three strong years followed by a negative one, such as 2022 and 2018, where all equity groups gave away at least a portion of the previous three years' gains? That's when diversification ticks in. For details of all the above, visit www.fundmonitors.com or directly to the Peer group comparison page https://www.fundmonitors.com/peergroups.php. We're approaching the end of the year, but Hedge Clippings is not quite ready to call it quits just yet. Given the tragedy and shock of Sunday's Bondi mass shooting, we were going to leave politics and interest rates alone this week, save to say that apparently the UK, US and others have issued a travel advisory to their citizens suggesting Australia is not a safe destination. Sadly. We never thought we'd hear that, but maybe we all need to work harder at being truly tolerant, irrespective of our views, background, religion or ethnicity, and understand how lucky we are - or should be - to live here. News | Insights Market Commentary | Glenmore Asset Management 10k Words | Equitable Investors November 2025 Performance News Bennelong Twenty20 Australian Equities Fund Insync Global Capital Aware Fund Glenmore Australian Equities Fund Argonaut Natural Resources Fund Insync Global Quality Equity Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
12 Dec 2025 - Hedge Clippings |12 December 2025
|
|
||
|
Hedge Clippings | 12 December 2025
News | Insights Expert Analysis of the RBA's December 9 Rate Decision News and Views: The impact of a steeper yield curve on global listed infrastructure | 4D Infrastructure Infrastructure in focus: The industrial heartland | Magellan Asset Management November 2025 Performance News 4D Global Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged) Bennelong Emerging Companies Fund Bennelong Concentrated Australian Equities Fund |
||
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
5 Dec 2025 - Hedge Clippings | 05 December 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 05 December 2025 At the kind invitation of Conexus Financial, Hedge Clippings attended their Professional Planner Researcher Forum earlier this week. Held over two days in the Blue Mountains, apart from AFM, the event brought together a wide range of industry and sector participants (including research houses Lonsec, Morningstar, SQM, and Zenith), asset consultants, platform operators, advice groups, along with many others from the industry. Keynote speakers included ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland, industry luminary Graham Rich, and former gold medal-winning swimming legend Grant Hackett, now CEO of GDG, the listed owner of Lonsec and Evidentia. It's fair to say that the major and constantly recurring theme was the issue of conflict of interest (potential or real, depending on one's point of view) against the backdrop of the failure of Shield and First Guardian. However, rather than trying to cover the entire proceedings in Hedge Clippings, we have included selected links below to Professional Planners' own coverage of their event, and would recommend our readers explore further if interested. Commissioner Alan Kirkland, while defending the speed at which ASIC moved to shut down Shield and First Guardian, left no one in any doubt that they will not only be taking legal action against those they believe responsible, but will be following that up with new regulations, although non-specific on what those will be. One has to hope that it will be a practical and measured reaction, although we will have to wait and see in that regard. Insignia Financials' CEO Scott Hartley predicted a chaotic year ahead, thanks to Shield and First Guardian and the regulators' response. All present agreed this combination has potentially created a watershed moment for the research and advice sector, although depending on where one's loyalties, level of conflict of interest, or culpability lies, not everyone agreed on the solution, or in the case of conflict of interest, if they had one! Of interest was Morningstar's impending change to a "pay to play" model, just as ASIC is expected to increase scrutiny on the sector. Graham Rich summed up the issue of conflict nicely by reminding all present why some people rob banks ("it's simple, that's where the money is") while others were heard to comment "no conflict, no interest". We maintain the view that the "issuer pays" model is inherently conflicted and therefore open to potential abuse, even if not by the main participants, then by the bad actors in the distribution chain, including some, such as lead generators, that ASIC claims are outside the regulator's jurisdiction. For our part, we pointed out that while the consumer (advisors and platforms) might want a research report (even if they're not paying for it), the party paying, namely the fund manager, is more interested in the actual rating. Enough! Next week, the RBA meets for the last time this year, and we'll bring you our synopsis of the outcome, thanks to Renny Ellis and Nick Chaplin, from Arculus and Seed Funds Management, respectively. And for those more interested in trivia and comedy than conflicts of interest, today marks the 51st anniversary of the last Monty Python Flying Circus show back in 1974. In our opinion, it was, and remains one of the best, and most groundbreaking comedy series ever. News | Insights New Funds on FundMonitors.com 10k Words | Equitable Investors Is travel becoming the new status symbol for Gen Z? | Insync Fund Managers October 2025 Performance News November 2025 Performance News Bennelong Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
28 Nov 2025 - Hedge Clippings |28 November 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 28 November 2025 At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the chances of a rate cut in December - and probably well into 2026 - took another blow this week when the ABS released October's first full monthly CPI number. Even though the actual number for the month was flat, or just 0.3% seasonally adjusted, the 12-month result of 3.8% (or 3.9% seasonally adjusted) was a shocker. The RBA's preferred measure was a more reasonable, but still upward-trending, 3.3%. Stating the obvious, Treasurer Jim Chalmers accepted that the result was "higher than we would like" before trying to deflect the criticism by saying that it was significantly lower than when the government took office. However, having claimed that the economy (and inflation) had turned the corner just 5 months ago, the latest result was the fourth consecutive monthly rise since June's result of 1.9%. So looking forward to the RBA's decision on the 10th of December, one would have to assume "no change" at best, but one has to wonder if the board aren't regretting their most recent rate cut in August, and if it was premature - as suggested at the time by Hedge Clippings' expert fund managers Renny Ellis from Arculus, and Nick Chaplin from Seed Funds Management. We'll check back in with them next week to get their take on what they think is in store, including if they think October's flat result for the month is a glimmer of hope, either for homeowners or Jim Chalmers. Meanwhile in the US the gyrations in expectations for a cut by the FED continue, with financial markets pricing in an 84.9% probability of a cut of 0.25% in December according to CME's FedWatch tool, and backed up by data showing a combination of increasing ongoing jobless claims, at the same time as consumers' assessment of the labour market is continuing to fall, as shown in the chart below. Meanwhile, we received multiple responses and questions surrounding last week's table showing the relative performance of the Australian Small/Mid Cap sector as selected and filtered using FundMonitors' quant Star Ranking process, and the 10 of funds making up the top/bottom of the 97-member peer group. We have reproduced last week's table as a chart to emphasise the differences. Each fund in the top group was selected based on scoring 4 or 5 Stars consistently over all time periods. Conversely, the bottom group consistently scored only 1 or 2 Stars. Obviously, there was a logical difference in average annualised performance between the top and bottom 10 funds in each group, but the extent was surprising. Firstly, selecting (or avoiding) funds based on consistent past performance is key, even if past performance is no guarantee in the future. It is simply the best indicator available. Secondly, "average" is just that, and makes a case for passive or index investing. Thirdly, the market's return (and particularly the ASX Small Ordinaries Index) over the past 1, 2 and even 3 years has been anything but ordinary. Interestingly, performance was more important than risk. Filtering out top-performing funds that had drawdowns in negative years, such as 2022 or 2018, resulted in a significantly lower average return. News | Insights New Funds on FundMonitors.com Investment Perspectives: Maybe it's not "just like 1999" | Quay Global Investors Market Commentary | Glenmore Asset Management October 2025 Performance News Argonaut Natural Resources Fund Skerryvore Global Emerging Markets All-Cap Equity Fund Equitable Investors Dragonfly Fund Insync Global Quality Equity Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
21 Nov 2025 - Hedge Clippings |21 November 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 21 November 2025 Reflecting on last week's edition of Hedge Clippings we're struck by the fact that we could simply reproduce the commentary of the chances of a rate cut both here and in the US, but with some small adjustments to the actual numbers. In the case of the RBA's next meeting, due on the 8th and 9th of December, we'd suggest the decision to hold has pretty much been set in stone, with the only chance of a cut being next Wednesday's release of October CPI numbers. While the RBA's minutes of the November meeting showed the decision to hold was unanimous, there were plenty of variables and possibilities about how inflation and the labour market might influence monetary policy. Hedging of bets (appropriate, given the meeting was held on Cup Day) was covered by consideration of multiple factors, uncertainties, resulting in "on the one hand" and then in the next sentence (or paragraph) "on the other hand". At least we know the Board explored all the options! Meanwhile, over in the US, last week we noted that the market's near overwhelming certainty (97%) of a rate cut just a month ago, had dropped to 50/50 based on a FactSet poll of market economists. This has now slipped further to being an outside chance at 22%, in spite of Trump's rhetoric and abuse directed at Jerome Powell, and the pressure he's trying to put him under. From what we've observed, Powell, to use the phrase coined by Maggie Thatcher way back in 1980, "is not for turning." As it is, Powell's term ends next May, so he probably feels he has a point to make regarding his independence, and the likelihood of his appointment for another (third) term is zilch, at least while Donald is in the White House. He might as well tough it out. The US Fed's next FOMC meeting is also in the second week of December, so on current projections, there'll be plenty of discussion and opinion, but not much action. Where there is action is in equity markets, with increasing calls from various well-known parties that the stretched valuations in the tech sector can't continue forever. Others of course maintain the usual mantra that "this boom is different" - and while it may be, the signs and psychology seem very similar. The following chart, courtesy of Callum Thomas of The Weekly Chartstorm, paints an eerie picture: News | Insights Manager Insights Video | Magellan Investment Partner The Housing Squeeze | Airlie Funds Management Staying the course | Canopy Investors October 2025 Performance News Glenmore Australian Equities Fund Bennelong Concentrated Australian Equities Fund 4D Global Infrastructure Fund (Unhedged) Bennelong Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
14 Nov 2025 - Hedge Clippings |14 November 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 14 November 2025 Any lingering chances of a rate cut before Christmas - already unlikely given the uptick in the September quarter CPI to 3.2% - went out of the window yesterday when the October Labour Force figures were released, showing unemployment had dropped to 4.3% after rising 4.5% in September. The number of unemployed people dropped by 17,000, while the ranks of the employed increased by 42,000. If that's the case, there's no RBA meeting in January, so speculation will have to wait until February, but mid-2026 or even beyond is looking more likely. At the same time, the chances of a rate cut in the US - widely expected just a few weeks ago - also dropped to around 50/50 as a result of conflicting economic signals, thanks in part to the lack of data as a result of the US Government shutdown, a weakening labour market, and concerns about sticky inflation. There's time for the odds to move either way before the next FOMC meeting due on the 9th-10th of December. Meanwhile, among signs of stretched valuations and increasing equity market volatility - not only in the tech sector, but also amongst some local high-flying small-cap stocks we have taken a look at the performance of managed funds in the Australian Small to Mid-cap Peer Group. Not surprisingly, given the performance of the respective ASX200 and ASX Small Ordinaries indices, small caps outperformed large cap funds. The average return of all 97 funds in the small cap universe, broadly in line with the index over 1 - 5 years, will give encouragement to those who advocate passive investing via ETF's with their accompanying low fees. By filtering the list using AFM's Star Rankings, and only selecting funds with 4 or 5 Stars over 3 & 5 years, we created a portfolio of Top 10 funds which significantly outperformed the index. Using the same process to look at those funds with only 1 or 2 Stars, to come up with the bottom 10 funds, the result was equally predictable. Obviously, as in stock selection, manager selection is essential. Given that past performance cannot be guaranteed, how does one look at historical fund performance? We would suggest ignoring (or at least not jumping at) one-year performance. It can be misleading unless 3, 5 or 7 years is equally good. Taking 5 years covers a sufficient period, and then ensuring that the shorter-term performance is consistent. AFM's Star Ranking enables filtering on both performance and risk/volatility, and while not in-depth, it provides an initial, and significantly effective, and fast process to sort the wheat from the chaff and then allow concentrated analysis of the resulting funds. Of significant interest was the analysis of the funds at the bottom of the list based on recommended research ratings. In spite of these having a track record of being in the 3rd or 4th quartile performance over 1, 3, and 5 years, most of them came with "recommended" and in a couple of cases "highly recommended" research ratings from Zenith, Lonsec, Morningstar, or SQM. In fact, only one of them (yes, 1 out of 10) didn't have a rating. Which leads us to the question: What value can you put on (paid) research? News | Insights New Funds on FundMonitors.com Research house scrutiny needed | Fundmonitors.com Trip Insights: The US | 4D Infrastructure October 2025 Performance News Bennelong Emerging Companies Fund Quay Global Real Estate Fund (Unhedged) Bennelong Twenty20 Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
7 Nov 2025 - Hedge Clippings |07 November 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 07 November 2025 The RBA's Balancing Act -- Up, Down, or Just Stuck? The RBA did exactly what everyone expected this week -- nothing. Rates stay put at 3.6 per cent, and for now that seems the safest course. But between the lines of Governor Michelle Bullock's press conference and the latest forecasts, the more interesting question isn't what the RBA did, but what it might do next. Depending on your perspective, that next move could just as easily be up as down. For one, inflation is refusing to behave. After more than a year of steady declines, the September quarter showed prices ticking higher again -- both in the annual headline number of +3.2%, and in the trimmed mean, which the RBA watches most closely, of 1% for the September quarter, and 3% for the past 12 months. At 3 per cent annualised, underlying inflation is moving in the wrong direction, and the RBA now doesn't expect it to fall back to its 2.5 per cent target midpoint until June 2027. That's a long time to be patient. Add to that a housing market that's rising again, consumers who appear to be rediscovering their wallets, and a labour market that's still "a little tight", and you've got the ingredients for inflation to stick around longer than anyone wants. Bullock herself made the point that monetary policy is "a little restrictive", but not much more than that. Credit is flowing freely, private demand is lifting, and the early effects of rate cuts earlier in the year are still working their way through. If inflation does prove stubborn, the argument for a nudge back up in rates will be hard to ignore -- especially if the RBA wants to protect its hard-won credibility. Then again, the RBA knows the economy is fragile. Unemployment has crept up to 4.5 per cent, job growth is slowing, and productivity -- the missing ingredient in every optimistic forecast -- remains weak. Wages growth has already eased from its peak, suggesting inflationary pressure from the labour market may be topping out. Add in a backdrop of global uncertainty, slowing trade, and the lingering drag of higher household debt servicing costs, puts the case for staying put -- or even easing -- but only once the data shows inflation back on a downward path. The release of reliable monthly CPI numbers (in other words, based on full data) for October, due out on November 25, will provide a clearer and a more up to date picture. Bullock's message was cautious rather than hawkish: the Board will watch the data and reassess each month. And the RBA's own central forecast still assumes the next technical move will be a rate cut -- albeit not until well into 2026. So, which way does the wind blow? For now, it's a stalemate. Inflation's too high to cut, but growth's too soft to hike. The RBA will no doubt sit tight in December, talking tough but acting cautiously, while hoping those "temporary factors" in the September CPI really do prove temporary. If inflation edges higher again in the months to come, the probability of a hike rises -- perhaps not by much, but enough to keep markets nervous. Conversely, if inflation steadies and the labour market continues to ease, rate cuts will creep back onto the horizon by mid-late next year. The RBA's next move could still go either way. But for households, businesses, and markets, the message is the same: don't expect relief soon, and don't rule out another bump if inflation refuses to play ball. In other words, rates might not be going up, but they're certainly not going anywhere fast. News | Insights New Funds on FundMonitors.com Fund manager ratings: Why due diligence is key, even on ratings houses | Fundmonitors.com Magellan Global Quarterly Update | Magellan Asset Management |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
It's that time of year again when the Melbourne Cup and the RBA's Cup Day meeting collide - and once again, inflation has thrown a spanner in the works.
31 Oct 2025 - Hedge Clippings |31 October 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | Inflation Surprise Upsets the Cup Day Celebrations - 31 October 2025
News | Insights Expert analysis on what the RBA will do next Tuesday, November 4 Manager Insights | East Coast Capital Management China's Energy Pivot: The Turning Point Investors Can't Ignore | Insync Fund Managers September 2025 Performance News Bennelong Twenty20 Australian Equities Fund Insync Global Quality Equity Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
24 Oct 2025 - Hedge Clippings |24 October 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 24 October 2025 Albanese's Washington Waltz Prime Minister Anthony Albanese returned from his long-delayed audience with Donald Trump looking pleased -- and perhaps relieved. The headline takeaways were confirmation that Australia remains firmly within the AUKUS fold and a new rare-earth minerals partnership aimed at cementing our role in the global supply chain. Both announcements tick diplomatic boxes and offer a political win-win narrative at home: defence strength and economic opportunity. But they also come with heavy price tags, and even heavier geopolitical baggage. On AUKUS, Trump's assurance that the deal will continue may ease Canberra's nerves -- for now. But the reality remains that our nuclear-powered submarines are still many years, many billions, and several elections away. Even with bipartisan US support, the budgetary impact will be massive, and the timeline uncertain, even if the strategic and defence logic is inevitable. The promise of "interoperability" sounds impressive, but it translates into a dependency on US technology, training, and politics that's unlikely to get simpler under a second Trump presidency. The rare-earths agreement, meanwhile, sent a brief shiver of excitement through the mining sector. Australia already sits on a treasure trove of the minerals critical to EVs, batteries, and defence technology, and Washington's push to reduce reliance on China gives the deal global relevance. But as always, the devil lies in the processing. If Canberra insists that production move onshore -- as early reports suggest -- the cost and environmental hurdles could easily blunt the commercial enthusiasm. It's one thing to dig; quite another to refine and manufacture competitively. And then there's Beijing. Neither submarines nor strategic minerals are likely to make Australia's relationship with China any smoother - if anything, exactly the opposite. From Beijing's perspective, AUKUS still looks like containment, and any move to expand critical-mineral supply chains outside its orbit will be viewed through the same lens. Albanese may have brought back contracts and commitments, but not calm. Trump, for his part, was characteristically unfiltered -- including his barbed (but possibly tongue in cheek) comments about Kevin Rudd, which put him in good, or at least plentiful, company. For Albanese, the trip was a study in diplomacy under pressure: balancing alliances, economic realities, and domestic optics. For Australia, it's another reminder that while Washington handshakes make for good headlines, they often come with an open-ended invoice. News | Insights Australia's real estate shake-up: Where opportunity lies | Airlie Funds Management Skin in the game | Canopy Investors September 2025 Performance News Bennelong Emerging Companies Fund DAFM Digital Income Fund (Digital Income Class) Skerryvore Global Emerging Markets All-Cap Equity Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
17 Oct 2025 - Hedge Clippings |17 October 2025
|
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 17 October 2025 A Week Jim Chalmers Would Rather Forget It started with a backflip that was as inevitable as it was overdue. The Treasurer finally dropped the proposed plan to tax unrealised capital gains in superannuation balances over $3 million (although the amount is irrelevant, it was the concept that was the problem) -- an idea that had baffled economists, infuriated fund managers, and confused just about everyone else. Even among Labor's supporters, the policy looked tone-deaf. The notion that retirees and super funds could be taxed on paper profits, particularly in volatile markets, was always destined for the scrapheap. In the end, Chalmers bowed to a combination of political reality, a nudge from Paul Keating (never one to stay silent on superannuation), and what insiders describe as a not-so-gentle push from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese himself. The retreat was wrapped in the usual political spin -- "consultation," "refinement," "listening to stakeholders" -- but it was, quite simply, a climbdown from an idea that never should have seen daylight. Unfortunately for the Treasurer, the week didn't get any easier from there. During a "fireside chat" in New York, RBA Governor Michelle Bullock followed up with a blunt reminder that Australia's fiscal trajectory is unsustainable. Government spending, she warned, is growing faster than national income. The RBA, already worried about sticky inflation, coupled with falling productivity, now faces the added complication of a budget that's not pulling in the same direction. Bullock's comments were unusually pointed, suggesting rising concern inside Martin Place that fiscal policy and monetary policy are working at cross-purposes. And then came the kicker: fears that inflation is still running hotter than the RBA expected, her tone suggesting that the RBA might be preparing the public for the possibility that rates will stay higher for longer -- something neither homeowners nor the Treasurer will want to hear even if we are still two and a half years away from the next election. Whether Bullock's concerns are confirmed or not will be known on October 29th, when the ABS releases both monthly and quarterly inflation numbers for September. The June quarter annualised number was an encouraging 2.1%, but August's monthly figure (admittedly only partial) was a worrying 3.0%. If that trend continues, the central bank won't be loosening the reins on Melbourne Cup Day, so for anyone backing a rate cut, that might look like a long shot indeed. They might be encouraged by yesterday's September unemployment rate, which rose to 4.5%, the highest since November 2021. Although still historically tight, it's a signal that the labour market, one of the last bastions of strength in the post-pandemic recovery, may be beginning to soften. Ordinarily, a rise in unemployment might nudge the RBA toward cutting rates to prevent a sharper slowdown -- but if inflation is still above target (or even worse, rising) and with government spending still climbing, the central bank's hands will be tied. It's a classic economic tug-of-war: growth is faltering, inflation is lingering or rising, and the government's fiscal stance isn't helping either side win. For Chalmers, the optics are rough. After months of claiming Australia's economy is resilient and well-managed, the data is beginning to tell a different story -- one of slowing growth, weakening labour demand, and persistent cost-of-living pressures. The Treasurer can take small comfort in the fact that Australia is hardly alone in facing these challenges, but politically, that won't count. He's lucky the opposition is such a mess. However, in a single week, Albo has forced him to back down on a politically toxic policy, he's fended off criticism from Keating, the architect of superannuation, and listened to the central bank warn that his budget settings could be fuelling inflation. Add a rising unemployment rate to the mix, and it's no surprise Chalmers might be wishing for a quiet weekend -- perhaps one spent far from the Canberra bubble. Unfortunately, in the current environment, there's no such thing as a quiet week in economic policy. News | Insights New Funds on FundMonitors.com Quarterly State of Trend report - Q3 2025 | East Coast Capital Management 10k Words | October 2025 | Equitable Investors Investment Perspectives: Data Centres - An update is required | Quay Global Investors September 2025 Performance News Bennelong Concentrated Australian Equities Fund Argonaut Natural Resources Fund Glenmore Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |
