The nuclear industry is undergoing something of a renaissance. For anyone with an interest in the industry, even a passing one, it's been a painfully long wait, but the uranium worm certainly seems to have turned. Over the past 12-18 months, we have added positions in Boss Energy (BOE.ASX) and Paladin Energy (PDN.ASX), two uranium miners. At the time of writing, the uranium spot price had topped US$70/lb, a 13-year, pre-Fukushima high and contracted volumes are on the up. In that time there has been more than one surge in the commodities sector, but uranium has missed out every time. So how did we get here?

Langer Heinrich Stage 3 construction circa 2011 (about a month prior to Fukushima) - uranium was looking up

The Fall

Not much moves quickly in the nuclear industry. The last time we experienced this level of positivity, one of our team was on site at Paladin's Langer Heinrich (LH) uranium mine in Namibia. That was in early 2011 during the Stage 3 expansion (see above). The mood then had turned bullish even though the uranium price had peaked three years earlier at over US$130/lb

.

Uranium price, US$/lb (Source: Cameco)

Most commodities overshoot and that was certainly the case with uranium in 2007 as phenomenal Chinese growth erased a decades long malaise in uranium. However, over the next three years, the price did not dip below US$40/lb and exceeded US$70/lb around the time of that LH site visit - about where we find ourselves now. Prices were high, the mine was expanding, and uranium was being hailed as a natural alternative to coal for reliable baseload, driven by a "green energy" tailwind. What could go wrong?

An earthquake. And an unusually big and complex one at that. It struck the east coast of Japan in March 2011, just a handful of months after that LH site visit. At magnitude 9, the so-called Great East Japan Earthquake was the largest in Japan's history and the fourth largest recorded since the advent of modern seismology, 110 years earlier. In other words, this was a very rare event.

The earthquake and resulting tsunami disabled the cooling systems of the coastal Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, resulting in core meltdown in three reactors. While the Daiichi plant, which first began operating in 1971, was able to withstand the ground movement produced by the quake, it was not designed to cope with the 15m tsunami that followed.

Unfortunately, the engineers had used a 1960 Chilean earthquake and its resultant 3m tsunami to design some of the safety systems at Daiichi. The plant's 10m elevation should have allowed plenty of room for a "regular" tsunami but proved to be inadequate on this occasion as no-one anticipated the magnitude of this event. In short, Japan's nuclear industry, which accounted for ~30% of the country's electricity generation, shutdown in a nationwide safety review, whilst a pall was cast over the global industry that would last a decade.

A long, dark winter

Fukushima's impact on the global nuclear industry cannot be underestimated. For example, following the accident, Germany immediately shutdown eight of its 17 reactors and committed to close the remainder of its fleet, the last of which occurred in April 2023. Prior to the disaster, nuclear energy accounted for one-quarter of Germany's electricity production.

Overall, global electricity production from nuclear dropped 11%. Justifiably, fear of further accidents at older reactors and the increased cost of upgrading/replacing to newer, safer designs, impeded growth of the industry. Furthermore, sentiment was greatly impacted by the potential of renewables - would nuclear even be needed as baseload if windmills and solar panels could deliver zero-carbon power? On the supply demand side, Kazakhstan, the world's biggest producer of uranium, was ramping up production at the time of Fukushima, and continued to do so beyond the shutdown of the Japanese industry.

To compound the problem, Canada's Cameco commenced full-scale commercial production at the underground Cigar Lake in May 2015. The eventual commissioning was complex and protracted. Development had started a decade earlier, but a series of water inflows flooded the mine (it's not called Cigar Lake for nothing). At the bottom in October 2016, the spot price of uranium dipped to US$18/lb and it would be another four to five years before market would stir.

The Spring

We can probably trace the start of the current "boom" to mid-2021 when Canada's Sprott Asset Management founded its Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SPUT), a physically backed financial product. Its purchases helped soak up excess market supply within a gently improving backdrop for nuclear energy. This enthusiasm was shortly followed up at the COP26 meeting in Glasgow, Scotland, later that same year, where nuclear energy again featured as a low-carbon alternative to coal baseload power but arguably with more urgency.

It is increasingly apparent that net-zero by 2050 solely from renewables is extremely challenging and nuclear power represents one low-carbon way to fill the gap. In terms of power generation, nuclear energy offers several advantages over traditional baseload. Nuclear utilities are very long-life assets, land use is 30-100x less than other low CO2 options, CO2 emissions/kWh are lower than all other power sources except for wind, and life extensions of nuclear power plants represents the lowest cost low-CO2 energy.

Other factors have combined to add upward pressure to the uranium price. For example, in the US, the Inflation Reduction Act (Aug 22) provides tax credits and development incentives for existing reactors and uranium resources, while the DoE commenced purchases for its Federal Strategic Uranium Reserve (Sept 22). Elsewhere, nuclear energy has been included in the green energy taxonomies of the EU, UK and South Korea. In geopolitical terms, there is clear uranium (and gas) supply risk around Russia following the invasion of Ukraine and the coup in Niger, the world's sixth largest supplier, has caused consumers like France some concern.

From a capital point of view, we are seeing increased investment in nuclear power from Asia in particular (see above). On the supply side, uranium exploration and development has plummeted and remains at multi-year lows. While the uranium market is a closed and esoteric one that can be difficult to decipher, there is incremental benefit in the short-term from this supply-demand dynamic.

Where to from here?

While the outlook for the uranium market is better than it has been for more than a decade, challenges remain. Nuclear energy is still a divisive issue due to ever-lingering safety concerns, and it could be argued that countries like Australia may never see its use. Other factors that impede acceptance include the upfront cost of construction, strict regulation and the time to build a new plant, where the median time is currently around 80-90 months.

On the flip side, nuclear facilities are amongst the most rigorously engineered structures on Earth and provide very long life, consistent output. While upfront capex is very high, the levelized cost over the life of a nuclear asset is extremely competitive especially if life extensions to existing plants is considered. Moreover, new technologies, such as Small Modular Reactors (SMR) offer potential advantages in cost and safety. Finally, recent geopolitical developments such as the Russia/Ukraine conflict highlight the need for secure, reliable sources of power. In a world focused on low carbon electricity, it is not surprising that many nations are considering a nuclear future.

Author: David Haddad, Principal and Portfolio Manager

The first weekend of October saw the number of auctions decline significantly on the previous week (1215, down from 2,648), as is common on long weekends, caused by the AFL Public Holiday and the King's Birthday. Sydney recorded the most auctions of the capital cities, with 730 taking place, followed by Melbourne and Brisbane with 203 and 110 respectively. Adelaide and Canberra just missed out on triple digit figures, with 83 and 74 respectively, whilst just 13 and 2 auctions occurred in Perth and Tasmania respectively.

Whilst the number of auctions declined for the week, clearance rates remained strong at 70.3% across the combined capitals (up from 59.7% last year). This was driven by Adelaide, Sydney and Brisbane all recording above 70% clearance rates with 79.3%, 71.7% and 70.7% respectively. Melbourne and Canberra also had moderate clearance rates of 66.0% and 62.5% respectively.

The property market continued to grow yet again with a 0.8% rise for the month of September, taking quarterly growth to 2.2%. Adelaide experienced the largest monthly growth of 1.7%, followed by Brisbane and Perth with 1.3% each. Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra and Darwin all experienced growth with 1%, 0.3%, 0.2% and 0.1% respectively, whilst Hobart was the only capital city to fall in September with -0.6%.

Quarterly data is similar, again with Adelaide leading the way (4.3%), closely followed by Brisbane (3.9%), Perth (3.6%) and Sydney (2.5%). Melbourne and Darwin both increased 1.3% for the quarter, with Canberra at 0.4%. Again, Hobart is the only capital to not experience growth, falling by 0.2% for the quarter.

Whilst many economists predicted a softening in property prices in the later stages of 2023, dwelling values have remained strong. As we head into the spring and summer selling season, we may see supply increase slightly but the market remains extremely tight.

Clearance Rates & Auctions Week of the 3^rd of October 2023

Property Values as of 2^nd of October 2023

Median Dwelling Values as of 2^nd of October 2023

Quick Insights

Higher Blocks Means Lower Costs

In defiance of its own planning rules and legislation a local council in Melbourne has intervened to approve another two extra storeys on an apartment building development. The move was done under pressure to triple the proportion of affordable housing the development might offer.

As the urgency of a tight rental and housing market continues to grow we may very well be seeing similar occurrences throughout the capitals as local councils realise they have a role to play.

Source: Australian Financial Review

Vacancy Latency

Vacancy rates have once again dipped below the threshold and rents are likely to rise once more in the next quarter.

Without more supply from inner city developers and less demand from migration and those who cannot afford to buy, the situation will only continue. A suburb of particular has been Ryde, in New South Wales which has recorded a year-to-date rise of 17% in rents.

Source: Australian Financial Review

Develop or Sell

Dan Andrews stepped down as Victorian Premier last month and his replacement is keen to make a name for herself.

Jacinta Allan's government has now widened the vacant land tax to include areas outside Melbourne and long-abandoned plots in the inner city.

The tax now applies to residential properties which are unoccupied for more than six months a year in the hope that homeowners will either develop the land or sell to someone who will.

Source: Australian Financial Review

Author: Filippo Sciacca, Director - Investor Relations, Asset Management and Compliance

With the upcoming Voice referendum in Australia, the nation stands on the cusp of a significant constitutional change, emphasising the acknowledgment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as the original inhabitants and the establishment of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament. Here we aim to assess Australian corporate performance in the context of the indigenous reconciliation journey, particularly focusing on Reconciliation Action Plans and their varying stages.

Reconciliation Action Plans

Reconciliation Action Plans (RAPs) seek to enable organisations to take meaningful action to advance reconciliation.

Based around the core pillars of relationships, respect and opportunities, RAPs aim to provide tangible and substantive benefits for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, increase economic equity and supporting First Nations self-determination.

The four stages of a RAP are as follows:

1. Reflect: At this stage, organisations acknowledge the need for change and express their commitment to reconciliation. This stage, which normally takes around 12 months, involves building relationships and cultural awareness within the workplace.
2. Innovate: The Innovate stage focuses on implementing specific initiatives and programs that promote meaningful engagement and partnerships with indigenous communities. This stage normally takes around two years.
3. Stretch: Organisations at the Stretch stage are dedicated to integrating reconciliation into their core operations and actively seeking opportunities to advance indigenous participation, employment, and procurement. This stage normally takes around 2-3 years.
4. Elevate: The Elevate stage signifies a comprehensive and sustained approach to reconciliation, incorporating significant changes in organisational policies, practices, and cultural competency, ultimately striving for measurable outcomes.

Corporate Performance and RAPs

There are presently 43 companies in the S&P/ASX 100 with RAPs in place. These companies are distributed across the Reflect, Innovate, Stretch, and Elevate stages. Notably, 57 companies in the ASX 100 do not have RAPs, suggesting that there is room for growth in corporate engagement in indigenous reconciliation.

The breakdown of companies by RAP stage and their associated values in the ASX 100 is as follows:

• Reflect: 12 companies with a total value of $300 billion
• Innovate: 14 companies with a total value of $125 billion
• Stretch: 10 companies with a total value of $400 billion
• Elevate: 7 companies with a total value of $120 billion

Figure 1: S&P/ASX 100 RAP Breakdown (number)

Source: IRESS, Reconciliation Australia, Tyndall AM, Oct 2023.

Figure 2: S&P/ASX 100 RAP breakdown (total market cap)

Source: IRESS, Reconciliation Australia, Tyndall AM, Oct 2023.

Additionally, sector-wise analysis demonstrates varying levels of engagement with RAPs:

• Financial sector companies exhibit substantial engagement, with 12 out of 19 companies having RAPs.
• The industrial and property trusts sectors also demonstrate significant engagement, with 7 out of 14 and 6 out of 10 companies having RAPs, respectively.
• Conversely, sectors including consumer discretionary, consumer staples, healthcare, and information technology lag behind in terms of RAP adoption.

Figure 3: S&P/ASX 100 RAP breakdown by industry

Source: IRESS, Reconciliation Australia, Tyndall AM, Oct 2023.

Specifically relating to the Voice referendum, it is interesting to note that 14 of the top 20 listed companies in Australia have expressed public support for the Voice. Somewhat surprisingly, of these 14 companies only 11 currently have RAPs. Less surprisingly, none of those 11 companies are at the Reflect stage and the majority are at the Elevate stage or beyond - essentially companies that are more progressed in their own reconciliation journey.

Figure 4: S&P/ASX 20 Voice Support

Source: IRESS, Reconciliation Australia, Tyndall AM, Oct 2023.

Incorporating Reconciliation into our ESG approach

ESG has always been a critical part of the Tyndall investment process. More recently we have added structure to the process via the development of an ESG scorecard amongst other longstanding initiatives including active ESG engagement and independent thought on ESG related matters. While social issues and diversity and inclusion performance have always been considered, we have recently updated our scorecard to specifically reflect where companies are at in their RAP journey.

Conclusion

Regardless of the outcome of the Voice referendum, it is clear that corporate Australia will play an increasingly significant role in progressing indigenous reconciliation efforts. This includes fostering genuine relationships, creating inclusive workplaces, and supporting initiatives that empower Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The pre-Voice referendum assessment of Australian corporate performance in the indigenous reconciliation journey through RAPs reveals both progress and areas for improvement.

While a notable number of companies have embraced reconciliation through the RAP framework, a significant proportion is yet to make a commitment. Encouragingly, there appears a growing understanding and acknowledgment of the need to meaningfully engage with indigenous communities.

Author: Michael Ward, Senior Research Analyst