NEWS

18 Sep 2026 - Hedge Clippings |18 September 2026
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 18 September 2026 Higher for Longer, Whether We Like It or Not News | Insights Market Commentary | Glenmore Asset Management What the headlines are missing on private credit | Magellan Investment Partners August 2026 Performance News Airlie Australian Share Fund Active ETF (ASX:AASF) |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |

18 Sep 2026 - Performance Report: Altor AltFi Income Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

17 Sep 2026 - Performance Report: ASCF High Yield Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

17 Sep 2026 - Performance Report: Bennelong Emerging Companies Fund
[Current Manager Report if available]

16 Sep 2026 - Beyond the hyperscaler: why data centre financing is a project, not a proxy
|
Beyond the hyperscaler: why data centre financing is a project, not a proxy abrdn September 2026 (3-minute read) Artificial intelligence (AI) is often framed as a software story. Yet what is unfolding looks increasingly like an infrastructure boom. Data centres sit at the centre of this buildout, housing the computing infrastructure needed to train, deploy and scale AI models. Like railways, power grids and telecommunications networks before them, they form part of the essential infrastructure on which a broader economic transformation depends. A new frontier for private creditFor private credit investors, this is creating a compelling opportunity in specialist asset-based finance. As demand for AI infrastructure grows, financing markets are evolving to support projects that are larger and more complex than traditional digital infrastructure investments. What is emerging is more than a larger market for lending. It is a specialist asset class bringing together elements of corporate credit, infrastructure, real estate, structured credit and project finance. While hyperscalers remain among the strongest corporate credits globally, the scale of planned investment means funding is increasingly being sourced from a broader range of capital providers. Tailored structures, higher yieldsJoint ventures, project-finance-style vehicles, structured financings and bespoke asset-based arrangements are becoming more common as borrowers and investors seek tailored solutions suited to individual projects. Data centre finance therefore provides a useful lens through which to view the future of private credit: specialist areas where structuring expertise, underwriting skill and tailored capital solutions can create value. These financings often provide exposure to long-term contractual cash flows supported by high-quality hyperscaler counterparties, but with higher yields than debt issued directly by the same companies. At first glance, many appear straightforward: tenant or guarantor exposure plus an additional yield spread. Public-market pricing often reflects this view, with spreads closely linked to those of the underlying counterparty. The additional yield is often viewed as compensation for complexity and reduced liquidity, rather than materially different credit risks. Data centre finance is project finance, not hyperscaler creditHowever, these are ultimately asset-based project financings, not corporate financings. Many structures are designed to transfer substantial construction, operational, power-supply, contractual and leasing risks to the hyperscaler, but those risks are never eliminated entirely. They can be reallocated, mitigated and managed through contractual arrangements, including triple-net leases with floor rent, residual-value guarantees, construction protections, date-certain rent commencement, debt-service reserves and debt that fully amortises within the initial lease term. Even so, the risks remain present to varying degrees. The fact that these financings typically do not carry the same credit ratings as the underlying hyperscalers illustrates the point. If they were equivalent exposures, they would have identical credit ratings. Instead, their ratings are typically heavily influenced by the hyperscaler's credit quality but generally sit below it to reflect the specific risks of the project. Why project structure drives outcomesIn our view, the most important question in data centre finance is what risks sit between the tenant and the lender. Answering that requires understanding how each project allocates risk. Construction risk, power availability, operating performance, contractual protections, refinancing structures, insurance arrangements and long-term asset competitiveness can all influence outcomes. In some transactions, underwriting may also depend on future refinancing conditions, or on the ability to renew and re-lease capacity once existing contracts expire. No two data centre financings are the same. Even two data centres underpinned by the same hyperscaler may transfer and mitigate risks in different ways, resulting in different risk-return profiles. Dispersion creates opportunities for specialist managersMarkets often treat new asset classes as relatively homogeneous in their early stages. Yet history suggests that, over time, differences in structure, underwriting quality and risk allocation become more important drivers of performance. Data centre finance appears unlikely to be an exception. As the sector matures, performance is likely to become more differentiated across projects. In a market characterised by bespoke structures, dispersion is to be expected. For skilled investors, that dispersion creates the opportunity to outperform. Capturing that opportunity requires robust manager selection and underwriting discipline. Understanding the creditworthiness of the hyperscalers supporting these projects remains essential. Investors need a view on the competitive position, financial strength and long-term prospects of the companies driving AI infrastructure demand. But that alone is insufficient. Underwriting these transactions requires expertise across corporate credit, project finance, infrastructure, real estate and structured credit. Depending on the transaction, sustainability factors may also be material to long-term asset resilience and downside risk. The strongest managers are likely to look beyond tenant or guarantor quality to assess whether the compensation offered is sufficient for the risks embedded in each project. The challenge is understanding which risks are being transferred, which risks are being retained and whether investors are being compensated appropriately. Investment discipline mattersThe AI infrastructure buildout is likely to create opportunities for many years to come. The challenge for investors is identifying which opportunities offer the most attractive risk-adjusted returns. Successful managers will need to ensure they are compensated for complexity, illiquidity and the project-specific risks that distinguish these investments from direct exposure to debt issued by the underlying hyperscalers. In our view, success in specialist asset-based private credit, including data centre financing, depends on maintaining a disciplined and selective approach, underpinned by transparency and strong governance in how each transaction is assessed and structured. The ability to say 'no' can be just as important as the ability to say 'yes'. Some opportunities may appear compelling at first glance but still fall short on closer inspection. The project structure may not be sufficiently robust, or the additional spread may not adequately compensate for incremental risks beyond those associated with the underlying hyperscaler. The most successful investors will not be those who finance the most projects, but those with the discipline to walk away from the wrong ones and the patience to wait for the most compelling opportunities. |
|
Funds operated by this manager: abrdn Sustainable Asian Opportunities Fund , abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Fund , abrdn Sustainable International Equities Fund , abrdn Global Corporate Bond Fund (Class A) |

15 Sep 2026 - Performance Report: Airlie Australian Share Fund Active ETF (ASX:AASF)
[Current Manager Report if available]

volatile, with ~60% of companies moving more than 5% on
the day of reporting. (2-minute read)
15 Sep 2026 - Glenmore Asset Management - Market Commentary
|
Market Commentary - August Glenmore Asset Management September 2026 (2-minute read) As is usually the case, the August 2026 reporting season was volatile, with ~60% of companies moving more than 5% on the day of reporting. In saying that, results generally proved to be better than expected, with the ASX All Ords Acc Index rising +1.9% during the month. Broadly speaking, stronger profitability margins helped to offset softer sales results. From sector perspective, resources were a clear stand-out (+11.4%), buoyed by strong commodity prices, whilst companies exposed to infrastructure investment, mining services and data centre expenditure also performed well. On the other hand, the impact of higher interest rates and changes to the Federal budget created strain upon both the housing market and consumer spending, weighing upon banks (-6.7%) and consumer discretionary (-10.6%). We note that the July inflation data (released late August) came in higher than forecast, increasing the chances of a rate hike later this calendar year. US equity markets rebounded from a weak July, with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ finishing +2.6% and +3.9%, respectively. This came despite continued bond market volatility and wariness regarding the returns being generated from the enormous amount of AI-related capex. Outside of the US, the Euro Stoxx 50 (+1.0%) and FTSE 100 (-0.4%) underperformed the US and Australian benchmarks. In bond markets, the US 10-year bond yield rose +2bps to 4.75%. Its Australian counterpart rose more sharply, increasing +17bps to 5.1%. The Australian dollar climbed to US$0.72, implying an increase of 1.5 cents. Funds operated by this manager: |

11 Sep 2026 - Hedge Clippings | 11 September 2026
|
|
|
Hedge Clippings | 11 September 2026 Oil closed above $100 again this week on the back of tit-for-tat strikes in the Strait of Hormuz, with Australia more exposed to the price of oil than almost any other developed economy. The RBA's deputy governor told the ABC that the country is "furious" about inflation for good reason, while in the US, strong job numbers and tonight's CPI figure are reshaping the case for a September hike. Oil is back above $100 on direct strikes against Iranian tankers, while Australia consumes more diesel per person than any other OECD economy Brent crude settled above $100 a barrel this week after US Central Command confirmed American forces destroyed Iranian oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman and near Kharg Island, Iran's primary export hub, while Iranian backed Houthis separately attacked Saudi energy facilities. It is Brent's first close above $100 since July, and Iran has vowed to intensify attacks if US strikes continue, a genuine escalation rather than the on-again, off-again diplomacy Hedge Clippings has tracked for months. US diesel hit a record US$5.94 a gallon on the news. The number matters disproportionately for Australia: per OECD data, Australia consumes 1.10 tons of oil equivalent of diesel per capita per annum, the highest of any OECD country and well above the 0.64 average, while CBA research puts Australian diesel consumption at 7.67 barrels per capita, roughly 80% higher than the US and eight times China's. Only around 13% of Australia's diesel is refined domestically, making it one of the world's largest diesel importers, with road transport, mining and agriculture together accounting for the bulk of demand. Every prior Hormuz escalation has fed directly into Australian headline CPI with a lag of one to two months, because diesel touches freight, food logistics and construction costs before it shows up in a fuel bowser, and the CPI. This is not a story to file under "offshore geopolitics." It is a direct input to inflation that the RBA will react to at its next meeting. "People are furious about inflation": Deputy Governor Hauser was unusually blunt, and the market still isn't fully buying the hawkish part RBA Deputy Governor Andrew Hauser told the ABC's 7.30 report on Tuesday that inflation is the economy's "one big problem" and that Australians are, in his words, "furious about inflation": "Everywhere I go, I hear cost, cost, cost, inflation, inflation, inflation, and that's our responsibility. We have to put that right." He named three specific forces keeping inflation elevated, the Middle East crisis, the global AI driven investment boom, and weakness in the economy's supply potential, and made the tightening bias explicit: "We could raise interest rates sharply, we could do it tomorrow," though he stressed the board isn't at that point because it still wants to protect employment gains and avoid an unnecessarily hard landing. Assistant Governor Sarah Hunter made similar remarks the same day, reinforcing the message rather than softening it. Headline inflation stood at 3.5% to July, trimmed mean has been at 3.6% for three months in a row, and all four major banks are now forecasting a hike by year end. The genuine tension is that this is some of the most explicitly hawkish language from the RBA all year, delivered three weeks ahead of the 29-30 September board meeting. Hauser's own framing supports that read Australia is "doing quite well" on unemployment and real household incomes, in his words, which is precisely the kind of language a central bank uses when it wants markets to take a hike seriously without actually committing the board to one. The next inflation number is due the day after the September meeting ends, meaning the board will vote without the data point markets might expect it to wait for. Coordinated hawkish messaging from two RBA officials in one day, with more interviews and commentary due next week, and ahead of a meeting where the board won't have the freshest inflation data, looks like a deliberate attempt to do some of the tightening through language rather than the cash rate itself. The RBA's next real lever is action, not more interviews. US Payrolls blew past forecasts, oil is surging, and tonight's CPI result lands five days before the Fed decides US non-farm payrolls for August, released on September 4th, rose 162,000 against a forecast of just 55,000, the strongest number since March and the first month of net job gains in five months, with unemployment steady at 4.1% and prior months revised up a combined 55,000. That will be the last major inflation data before the Fed's 15-16 September meeting, with economists expecting headline inflation to accelerate to around 3.4% annually on rising energy costs, while core CPI eases to roughly 2.4%. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh used his Jackson Hole speech last month to make clear he isn't ready to declare victory, in his words, recent readings "do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved." Rate hike odds have whipsawed for exactly that reason, and Brent's move back above $100 this week, combined with the payrolls number, is the fresh input markets are now pricing into a decision that looked closer to settled a fortnight ago. A strong jobs report and an oil shock landing in the same fortnight is the least convenient combination for a Fed trying to justify a pause. If tonight's CPI shows the energy pass-through Warsh has been warning about, the "coin flip" Hedge Clippings described a week ago tips meaningfully back toward a hike before next week's decision. News | Insights
Infrastructure in focus: The burning infrastructure issue from wildfires | Magellan Investment Partners August 2026 Performance News Bennelong Australian Equities Fund Quay Global Real Estate Fund (Unhedged) Active ETF (ASX:QGRU) Bennelong Concentrated Australian Equities Fund |
|
|
If you'd like to receive Hedge Clippings direct to your inbox each Friday |

11 Sep 2026 - Performance Report: Seed Funds Management Financial Income Fund - Incl Franking
[Current Manager Report if available]

